Cryogenic CO2 Trapping and Graphite Reduction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for converting CO2 from carbonaceous samples to solid graphite for isotope ratio analysis are limited by sample cross-contamination, high handling complexity, and high per-sample costs, which hinder high-throughput sample preparation and precise isotope quantification in accelerator mass spectrometry.

Innovation Solution

A system using septa-sealed vials with a pre-selected amount of zinc and a catalyst, cryogenic cooling, and controlled heating to trap and reduce CO2 to solid graphite, minimizing leakage and contamination, and employing disposable materials to facilitate high-throughput sample preparation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional methods are used to convert CO2 to graphite, then the conversion can be achieved, but sample cross-contamination occurs and handling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisotope ratio analysis precisionVSAvoidsample handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the sample processing into separate sealed reaction vessels (vials), each containing isolated CO2 samples. This segmentation prevents cross-contamination between samples while simplifying handling through individualized containment units that can be processed independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs disposable sealed vials for each sample conversion. These single-use containers eliminate cross-contamination risks by ensuring each sample is processed in a fresh, uncontaminated environment, then discarded after use, simplifying the overall handling protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Productivity

If traditional CO2 to graphite conversion is performed, then the process can be completed, but per-sample costs are high and throughput is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample processing throughputVSAvoidper-sample cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary trapping and concentration of CO2 in sealed vials before the graphite conversion step. This pre-preparation allows multiple samples to be ready for simultaneous processing, increasing throughput while reducing per-sample costs through batch operation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes cryogenic temperature parameters to trap and concentrate CO2 efficiently in the vials. This parameter change enables high-yield CO2 recovery that reduces material waste and lowers per-sample costs while maintaining high processing throughput through standardized temperature protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If CO2 samples are handled using conventional methods, then conversion to graphite is achieved, but leakage and contamination occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample integrityVSAvoidleakage and contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates an inert sealed environment within each vial containing the CO2 sample and reaction components. This isolated atmosphere prevents leakage to the external environment and protects the sample from external contamination, ensuring high reliability and sample integrity throughout the conversion process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The sealed vial acts as an intermediary barrier between the CO2 sample and the external environment. This intermediate containment structure allows the conversion reaction to proceed while preventing direct contact between the sample and potential contaminants or leakage paths outside the vial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the efficient conversion of CO2 to graphite with high yield and precision, allowing for the accurate quantification of 14C isotopes with minimal sample handling and low per-sample costs, supporting high-throughput sample processing and precise isotope ratio analysis.

Implementation Method 1

The vial, tube, reductant, and catalyst are cryogenically cooled. Oxide gases are trapped in the vial.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCryogenic cooling: Cryogenics

Implementation Method 2

At least a portion of the vial, tube, reductant, catalyst, and oxide gases are heated.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

A pre-selected amount of reductant is provided in a vial. A pre-selected amount of a catalyst is provided in the tube. Oxide gases are trapped in the vial. At least a portion of the vial, tube, reductant, catalyst, and oxide gases are heated.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS7611903B2System for trapping and storing gases for subsequent chemical reduction to solids
Publication Date: 2009.11.03 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC
  • US7611903B2 patent drawing
  • US7611903B2 patent drawing
  • US7611903B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for quantitatively reducing oxide gases. A pre-selected amount of zinc is provided in a vial. A tube is provided in the vial. The zinc and the tube are separated. A pre-selected amount of a catalyst is provided in the tube. Oxide gases are injected into the vial. The vial, tube, zinc, catalyst, and the oxide gases are cryogenically cooled. At least a portion of the vial, tube, zinc, catalyst, and oxide gases are heated.