Cryogenic cooling apparatus, methods, and applications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cryogenic cooling methods for small biological samples, such as those used in X-ray crystallography, suffer from irreproducibility, sample damage, and slow cooling rates, leading to incomplete data collection and structural variability due to ice nucleation and conformational changes during cooling.

Innovation Solution

A cryogenic cooling manifold and method that controls the gas layer above a liquid cryogen to achieve variable and rapid cooling rates, minimizing ice formation and sample damage by using a specially designed manifold with channels and heating elements to manage the temperature transition and gas flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If manual plunge cooling into liquid nitrogen is used, then cooling is achieved, but cooling rate is slow and ice nucleation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling rateVSAvoidice nucleation
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a controlled gas layer as an intermediary medium between the sample and liquid nitrogen. This gas layer mediates heat transfer, enabling rapid cooling while preventing direct contact that would cause ice nucleation. The gas layer acts as a buffer that controls the cooling process and eliminates harmful ice formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the cooling environment by controlling gas flow rate, gas temperature, and gas layer thickness. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves optimal cooling rates while maintaining conditions that prevent ice nucleation, transforming the cooling process from a harmful direct plunge to a controlled parametric process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If fast cooling is applied, then ice formation is reduced, but sample damage increases due to thermal stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice formationVSAvoidsample integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality control by creating a non-uniform temperature distribution in the gas layer. The gas temperature and flow characteristics are optimized locally at different positions around the sample, allowing rapid heat removal from critical regions while maintaining gentler conditions elsewhere, thus preventing both ice formation and thermal shock damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts gas flow rate and gas layer thickness during the cooling process. By making the cooling conditions time-dependent and adaptive, the system can achieve fast initial cooling to prevent ice nucleation, then gradually reduce cooling intensity to minimize thermal stress on the sample structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Temperature

If gas flow is increased to remove cold gas layer, then cooling rate increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling rateVSAvoidgas flow energy
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using just enough gas flow to achieve the necessary cold gas layer removal and optimal cooling rate, rather than excessive gas flow. The system identifies and maintains the minimum required gas flow conditions that still achieve rapid cooling, thereby reducing energy consumption while preserving cooling effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables cooling rates up to 100,000 K/s for small samples, ensuring reproducible and optimal cryopreservation with minimal ice formation and sample contamination, improving data collection efficiency in X-ray crystallography and other biotechnological applications.

Implementation Method 1

A cryogenic cooling manifold and method that controls the gas layer above a liquid cryogen to achieve variable and rapid cooling rates, minimizing ice formation and sample damage by using a specially designed manifold with channels and heating elements to manage the temperature transition and gas flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

Cooling rates up to 100,000 K/s for small samples, ensuring reproducible and optimal cryopreservation with minimal ice formation and sample contamination

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Heat Sink

Data Source

PatentUS12498159B2Cryogenic cooling apparatus, methods, and applications
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 MITEGEN LLC
  • US12498159B2 patent drawing
  • US12498159B2 patent drawing
  • US12498159B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cryogenic cooling manifold and methods incorporating a cryogenic cooling manifold for managing the gas layer(s) above a liquid cryogen to control cooling temperature-time profiles and ice formation for microliter and smaller samples that are plunged through the gas and into the liquid cryogen.