Multistage Cryogenic Expander With Variable Nozzle Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas liquefaction processes face inefficiencies due to high energy consumption and the limitations of Joule-Thomson valves for cryogenic fluid expansion, particularly in reducing the temperature of liquefied gases like propane and methane, which requires significant energy input and is not commercially viable at lower temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A multistage expander with hydraulic stages having different physical geometries for nozzle vanes and a double wound stator with adjustable windings to optimize performance across varying operating conditions, allowing for efficient energy extraction and conversion from high-pressure cryogenic fluids into kinetic and electrical energy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a Joule-Thomson valve is used for gas expansion, then the expansion process is simple, but the energy consumption is high and efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of expansion processVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the Joule-Thomson valve (a passive throttling device) with an expander machine that uses mechanical expansion to perform work. The expander converts the expansion energy of the gas into mechanical work, which is then converted to electrical energy, thereby utilizing the expansion energy instead of dissipating it, thus solving the high energy consumption problem while maintaining process simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The expander system uses the expansion energy of the gas itself to drive the expansion process and generate electricity, making the system self-sufficient in energy terms. The gas expansion directly powers the expander, which in turn provides cooling for the liquefaction process, creating a self-service energy cycle that eliminates the need for external energy input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If a single geometry nozzle vane is used in all hydraulic stages, then the device structure is simple, but the performance cannot be optimized for varying operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure uniformityVSAvoidperformance optimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different nozzle vane geometries to different hydraulic stages based on the local operating conditions. Each stage is designed with specific nozzle geometry optimized for its pressure and flow characteristics, allowing the system to maintain high efficiency across varying operating conditions while managing complexity through systematic design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates the ability to change nozzle vane configurations dynamically or semi-dynamically. By equipping the expander with multiple nozzle vane sets that can be swapped or adjusted, the system adapts to varying operating conditions, transforming a static single-geometry design into a dynamic multi-geometry system that optimizes performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the generator operates at fixed windings, then the structure is simple, but the efficiency drops significantly at loads below 100%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenerator structureVSAvoidgenerator efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the generator with dual windings that can operate in different configurations. The same generator structure can handle both 100% load conditions (using one winding) and 50% load conditions (using the other winding), making the generator universally applicable across different load requirements without sacrificing efficiency, thus solving the energy loss problem while controlling structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient reduction of enthalpy and temperature of cryogenic fluids, achieving 80-90% of ideal energy reduction, independent of Carnot efficiency, and maintains peak efficiency across a wide range of loads by dynamically adjusting windings and nozzle geometries, thus improving the overall efficiency and reliability of gas liquefaction processes.

Implementation Method 1

The solution enables efficient reduction of enthalpy and temperature of cryogenic fluids, achieving 80-90% of ideal energy reduction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnthalpy reduction:

Implementation Method 2

In 1902 the French engineer George Claude developed a piston expansion engine to replace the Joule-Thomson valve to extract mechanical work from the gas expansion process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas expansion work extraction:

Implementation Method 3

an expander is equipped with a generator having a double wound stator with two sets of parallel windings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 4

The cryogenic liquid expander directly extracts the heat energy from the liquefied gas by expanding the liquid from a high pressure level to a low pressure level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCryogenic expansion cooling:

Data Source

PatentUS8497616B2Multistage liquefied gas expander with variable geometry hydraulic stages
Publication Date: 2013.07.30 ELLIOTT CO
  • US8497616B2 patent drawing
  • US8497616B2 patent drawing
  • US8497616B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to an expander having two or more hydraulic stages with different physical geometries. In an embodiment, a first hydraulic stage uses nozzle vanes machined with a first geometry, while a second hydraulic stage uses nozzle vanes machined with a second geometry. Different nozzle vanes can be combined to tune the performance of the expander as the optimal operating conditions change. In yet another embodiment, an expander is equipped with a generator having a double wound stator with two sets of parallel windings. For high operating loads greater than a threshold, a first set of windings operates while a second set of windings, operating at a lower frequency, is disconnected. For operating loads that are less than the threshold, the first set of windings is disconnected and the second set of windings operates, enabling the generator to continue to operate close to 100% load for less expander power.