Cryogenic Syngas Separation for H2:CO Ratio Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The industry faces challenges in efficiently producing syngas with a desired hydrogen to carbon monoxide (H2:CO) molar ratio at high pressure without additional compression, while reducing power requirements and capital equipment costs, and minimizing impurities like methane in the cryogenic separation process.

Innovation Solution

A process and apparatus that involves partial condensation of the feed to separate hydrogen-enriched vapor and carbon monoxide-enriched liquid fractions, followed by cryogenic separation in a fractionator to achieve the desired H2:CO molar ratio, with optional steps for scrubbing and stripping to produce hydrogen and carbon monoxide product gases, and using reflux to optimize the separation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If cryogenic separation is used to produce syngas with desired H2:CO molar ratio at high pressure, then product purity and composition control are improved, but compression equipment and power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveH2:CO molar ratio controlVSAvoidcompression power requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The process changes the pressure parameter during the separation process by utilizing pressure differential between the high-pressure feed stream and the low-pressure separation column. The feed is depressurized to enable cryogenic separation, then the separated streams are repressured individually to achieve the desired high-pressure syngas product without requiring compression of the final mixture, thereby reducing overall compression power requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The process segments the syngas production into distinct separation and repressuring stages. Instead of compressing the final syngas mixture, the process separates components at low pressure and then repressures the hydrogen-rich and carbon monoxide-rich streams independently before combining them, eliminating the need for high-power compression equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stress or pressure

If additional compression equipment is added to produce high-pressure syngas, then product pressure is improved, but capital equipment costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesyngas product pressureVSAvoidcompression equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process divides the pressure management into separate stages: feed depressurization for separation, low-pressure separation operations, and individual repressuring of separated streams. This segmentation eliminates the need for a single high-pressure compression system, reducing both capital equipment costs and device complexity while still achieving the required high-pressure product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process replaces the mechanical compression system with a pressure differential-based separation system. Instead of using compressors to achieve high pressure, the process uses pressure reduction to enable separation, then utilizes pressure exchangers or expansion devices to recover and redistribute pressure energy, substituting mechanical compression with thermodynamic pressure management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If cryogenic separation process is simplified, then device complexity and costs are reduced, but ability to minimize methane impurity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation process complexityVSAvoidmethane impurity in product gas
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process extracts methane and other heavy hydrocarbons from the syngas stream during the cryogenic separation phase. By operating the separation column at low pressure and appropriate temperature, methane is preferentially condensed and removed in the liquid phase, while hydrogen and carbon monoxide remain in the vapor phase, achieving effective methane impurity minimization through selective extraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The process utilizes changes in temperature and pressure parameters to optimize separation efficiency. By controlling the condensation temperature and pressure differential, the process maximizes methane removal while maintaining low device complexity, as the natural condensation behavior of methane at cryogenic temperatures provides efficient separation without requiring additional complex equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for efficient production of syngas with a desired H2:CO molar ratio at suitable pressure without further compression, reducing power consumption and equipment size, and effectively minimizing methane concentration in the product gas, thereby lowering production costs.

Implementation Method 1

partially condensing the feed to provide a hydrogen-enriched vapor fraction and a carbon monoxide-enriched liquid fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial condensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

cryogenically separating at least a portion of the two-phase admixture in a first fractionator to form a first product gas and a hydrogen-depleted liquid fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCryogenic separation: Cryogenics

Implementation Method 3

at least one of the liquid fraction of the two-phase admixture and the at least a portion of the carbon monoxide-enriched liquid fraction are partially vaporized

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial vaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

introducing at least a portion of the condensate into the first fractionator as reflux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflux: Distillation

Data Source

PatentUS9909803B2Cryogenic separation of synthesis gas
Publication Date: 2018.03.06 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US9909803B2 patent drawing
  • US9909803B2 patent drawing
  • US9909803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process and apparatus for separating a feed containing hydrogen, carbon monoxide, methane, and optionally nitrogen to form a product gas having a desired H2:CO molar ratio and optionally a hydrogen product gas and a carbon monoxide product gas. The feed is partially condensed to form a hydrogen-enriched vapor fraction and a carbon monoxide-enriched liquid fraction. The hydrogen-enriched vapor fraction and carbon monoxide-enriched liquid fraction are combined in a regulated manner to form an admixture, which is cryogenically separated to form the product mixture having the desired H2:CO molar ratio.