Cryptocurrency Valuation and Decentralized Custody Framework

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for querying and characterizing blockchain transactions are inadequate for analytical workloads, and traditional data mining and machine learning approaches fail to accurately represent blockchain behaviors due to insufficient data and unknown categories, leading to high error rates. Additionally, existing asset management systems are ill-equipped to securely value and safeguard cryptocurrency assets, which are prone to theft and require new valuation techniques that account for their unique nature.

Innovation Solution

A novel valuation framework for cryptocurrency assets based on developer activity, project utility, and market maturity, using a Fundamental Crypto Asset Score (FCAS) that incorporates unique data sources and characteristics, along with a decentralized algebraic mechanism for custodial services that splits private keys among multiple parties to secure assets without a single point of failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional data mining and machine learning approaches are used to characterize blockchain transactions, then the analysis can be performed with existing tools, but the error rates become extremely high due to insufficient data and unknown categories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of behavior characterizationVSAvoiderror rate in clustering results
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the approach by changing the parameters used for characterization from traditional probabilistic clustering to a hybrid model that incorporates deterministic rules, graph theory metrics, and behavioral patterns. This fundamental parameter change allows accurate characterization even with limited data by relying on structural properties of blockchain transactions rather than statistical assumptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of analysis that processes raw transaction data through multiple stages: initial filtering using deterministic rules, graph-based relationship mapping, and behavioral pattern recognition. This intermediary processing layer bridges the gap between raw data and meaningful insights, reducing error rates by validating results through multiple independent analysis pathways

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If conventional asset management systems are used to safeguard cryptocurrency assets, then custody services can be provided by third-party trusts, but the problem is simply pushed onto a separate party and clients do not want to be responsible for securing their own assets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of asset custodyVSAvoidsecurity of private keys
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the private key into multiple distinct shards using secret sharing schemes. Each shard alone is insufficient to access the asset, but a threshold number of shards can reconstruct the private key. This segmentation distributes trust across multiple parties and eliminates single points of failure, allowing clients to access assets conveniently through authorized combinations of key holders without relying on a single third-party custodian

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by pre-distributing key shards to multiple trusted parties before any security incident occurs. This proactive measure ensures that even if one or more key holders are compromised, the assets remain secure as long as the threshold is not met. The system cushions against future security threats by design rather than reacting to incidents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional valuation metrics are used for cryptocurrency assets, then familiar financial methods can be applied, but many metrics do not exist or are not as accurate for crypto-assets due to their different underlying structures and activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of valuation methodVSAvoidaccuracy of asset valuation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the valuation parameters from traditional financial metrics (P/E ratios, market cap based on earnings) to blockchain-specific parameters including transaction volume, active addresses, developer activity, network hash rate, and protocol adoption metrics. These parameter changes reflect the actual value drivers of cryptocurrency assets, improving valuation accuracy while maintaining systematic assessment approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal valuation framework that can assess different types of cryptocurrency assets (coins, tokens, utility tokens, security tokens) using a common set of adjusted metrics. This multi-functional approach adapts traditional valuation principles to work across diverse crypto-asset classes by modifying the relevant parameters for each asset type rather than requiring entirely different valuation methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If blockchain data is stored and accessed using traditional database structures, then existing database tools can be used, but addresses, transfer style transactions, contracts, and contract method calls are fundamentally different entities that require unique storage choices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of data storage systemVSAvoidability to handle different data entities
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments blockchain data into distinct structured categories: transaction data, contract data, account data, and metadata. Each segment is stored in optimized formats suited to its specific access patterns and query requirements. This segmentation allows the system to handle fundamentally different entities (addresses, transactions, contracts) efficiently while maintaining overall system simplicity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds dimensional organization to blockchain data by creating multi-level indexes and hierarchical structures that enable efficient querying across different data types. Rather than forcing all data into a single flat structure, the system organizes data along multiple dimensions (time, account, transaction type, contract address) allowing versatile access patterns while maintaining storage efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10706472B1Systems and methods for analysis of digital asset development and transaction behaviors
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 EDISYL INC
  • US10706472B1 patent drawing
  • US10706472B1 patent drawing
  • US10706472B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The fundamental health of a crypto-asset is determined based on factors associated with the development and utility of the crypto-asset. Developer activity data associated with the crypto-asset is received from one or more interfaces associated with one or more development servers associated with the crypto-asset, and a developer activity factor is calculated based on the developer activity data. A connection is established to a blockchain server that maintains a blockchain that tracks transactions associated with the crypto-asset, and transaction data for a plurality of the transactions is received from the blockchain server. A project utility factor is calculated based on a plurality of behavioral use cases derived from the transaction data, where the behavioral use cases are respectively associated with different uses of the crypto-asset. Then, a fundamental health score is determined for the crypto-asset based on the developer activity factor and the project utility factor.