Cryptographic Accelerator Montgomery Modular Multiplication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cryptographic accelerators face inefficiencies due to the computational intensity of modular multiplication operations in public-key cryptography, particularly in modular arithmetic, which are slow and complex, necessitating an optimization to reduce complexity and improve performance.

Innovation Solution

The cryptographic accelerator employs the Montgomery Modular multiplication technique and a configuration with multiple processing elements that process data-word portions of operands before they are fully loaded, allowing for unreduced modular multiplication results bounded by twice the modulus, thereby reducing the need for intermediate reductions and optimizing hardware complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional modular multiplication operations are used in public-key cryptography, then security is maintained, but processing speed is slow and hardware complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the modular multiplication operation into multiple parallel processing elements that each handle portions of the computation. This divides the complex operation into smaller, manageable units that can be processed simultaneously, reducing overall computation time while maintaining security requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation by using unreduced modular multiplication results bounded by twice the modulus instead of traditional reduced results. This parameter change eliminates the need for intermediate reduction operations, simplifying the hardware architecture and improving processing speed while maintaining cryptographic security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If intermediate reductions are performed during modular multiplication, then accuracy is maintained, but processing time increases and hardware complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the final reduction operation from the intermediate computation steps. By removing intermediate reduction operations and performing only a single final reduction, the system eliminates unnecessary computation time and hardware complexity while maintaining the accuracy and security of the modular multiplication result.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous computation by allowing processing elements to work continuously on unreduced results without interruption for intermediate reductions. This continuous action maintains productivity while reducing total computation time, as the computation flows uninterrupted through the processing elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Speed

If processing elements wait for complete operand loading before processing, then accuracy is ensured, but processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcomputation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by allowing processing elements to begin processing as soon as sufficient operand data is available, rather than waiting for complete loading. This preliminary processing maintains accuracy through proper handling of partial data while significantly improving processing speed by eliminating idle waiting time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the processing start condition flexible rather than static. Processing elements dynamically begin computation when readiness criteria are met, adapting to the actual data loading pace. This dynamic approach maintains computational reliability while optimizing processing speed through reduced idle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9600239B2Cryptographic accelerator
Publication Date: 2017.03.21 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US9600239B2 patent drawing
  • US9600239B2 patent drawing
  • US9600239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cryptographic accelerator performs various modular arithmetic operations producing unreduced results bounded by the double of the modulus (i.e.: 2*M). In doing so, various processing elements of an ALU of the cryptographic accelerator can begin to process respective data word portions of a modular arithmetic operations before the entirety of one or more operands are loaded. Similarly, various processing elements may begin to store their respective data word portions of a modular arithmetic result before the entirety of the result is calculated.