Cryptographic Printhead Encryption for Data Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for secure data transmission within digital devices to protect internal data, particularly print optimization algorithms, from being intercepted or reverse-engineered by third-party manufacturers who can physically tap into internal device signals.

Innovation Solution

A system with at least two processors is used, where one processor calculates and encrypts optimization parameters, and the secondary processor, integrated into an operational element like a printhead, decrypts and uses these parameters for optimized operations, ensuring data security and preventing reverse-engineering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If internal data transmission is performed without encryption, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but data security is compromised allowing third-party tapping and reverse-engineering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidencryption system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An encryption module is introduced as an intermediary component between the processor and printhead. This module encrypts print data before transmission and decrypts it at the printhead, preventing third-party tapping and reverse-engineering while maintaining secure communication channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The encryption system is segmented into distinct functional modules: an encryption module in the processor that encrypts data before transmission, and a decryption module in the printhead that decrypts received data. This segmentation allows security functions to be distributed and specialized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If encryption is implemented for internal data transmission, then data security and proprietary algorithm protection are improved, but device complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproprietary algorithm securityVSAvoiddual processor architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two processors with specialized roles: a main processor that handles encryption and a printhead processor that handles decryption. This segmentation distributes the computational burden and allows each processor to be optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The encryption/decryption process acts as an intermediary layer between the main processor and printhead. This intermediary mechanism protects proprietary algorithms by ensuring that sensitive data transformations occur within secured boundaries rather than exposed internal buses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If optimization parameters are transmitted in plain text, then processing speed is improved and ease of operation is enhanced, but manufacturing precision and print quality control are compromised due to potential interception

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint quality control securityVSAvoidencryption/decryption processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Encryption is performed in advance on all print data before transmission to the printhead. This preliminary encryption ensures that even if data is intercepted during transmission, the optimization parameters remain protected, maintaining print quality control security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The encryption/decryption intermediary processes data securely, ensuring that optimization parameters maintaining print quality are protected during transmission. The system balances security with efficiency by implementing encryption only where necessary for protecting proprietary algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10373032B2Cryptographic printhead
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 HAND HELD PRODS INC
  • US10373032B2 patent drawing
  • US10373032B2 patent drawing
  • US10373032B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printer is configured with a processor which calculates printhead control parameters, the control parameters being determined by the processor in such a way as to optimize the printing process of the printer's printhead. The processor determines the printhead control parameters according to an optimization algorithm stored in the printer. To maintain the internal security of the optimization algorithm, the printhead control parameters are encrypted by the processor. The encrypted printhead control parameters are then transmitted to the printhead via an internal data path of the printer. If a third party monitors the data along the internal data path, the encryption algorithm remains secure because the control parameters are encrypted. The printhead contains a second, dedicated processor. The printhead processor receives the encrypted printhead control parameters, and decrypts the control parameters. The printhead then prints according to the decrypted printhead control parameters, ensuring optimized printing.