Unified Cryptographic Service for Multi-Provider Key Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is no standardized mechanism for interacting with cryptographic accessories, services, or providers, leading to inconsistent integration with the JAVA Cryptography Architecture (JCA) and requiring client applications to support multiple cryptographic providers explicitly, which complicates security and compatibility.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a standardized application programming interface (API) like JCA that allows client applications to interact with cryptographic providers through a unified cryptographic service, managing vendor-specific code and key management, thus enabling seamless integration and improved security across various cryptographic hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If each client application integrates specifically with every cryptographic accessory, service, or provider it plans to support, then compatibility with multiple cryptographic providers is achieved, but device complexity and integration effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with multiple cryptographic providersVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a standardized API layer (intermediary) between client applications and cryptographic providers. This API acts as a mediator that translates application requests into provider-specific operations, eliminating the need for applications to integrate directly with each provider. The standardized interface handles vendor-specific code and key management, allowing applications to work with multiple providers through a single unified interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal cryptographic service layer that can work with multiple different cryptographic providers through a single standardized interface. This universal layer implements the JCA (Java Cryptography Architecture) standard, enabling one interface to control multiple cryptographic providers with different functionalities. The service layer adapts to various providers while presenting a consistent interface to applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If a standardized API like JCA is implemented to unify cryptographic operations, then ease of operation and security are improved, but the ability to support vendor-specific features may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of cryptographic integrationVSAvoidvendor-specific feature support
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cryptographic system into two distinct layers: a standardized API layer (JCA) that provides ease of operation and consistency, and a vendor-specific implementation layer that handles provider-specific features and code. This segmentation allows the standardized interface to maintain simplicity while the underlying segmented components handle vendor-specific functionality. Each cryptographic provider is segmented into its own module that implements the standard interface while maintaining its unique capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12519636B2Cryptographic processing
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 OMNISSA LLC
  • US12519636B2 patent drawing
  • US12519636B2 patent drawing
  • US12519636B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for cryptographic processing on client devices. A cryptographic service can receive a cryptographic operation request from a client application. The cryptographic operation request can include a key identifier for a private key and data to be cryptographically processed and the cryptographic operation request specifying a cryptographic operation to be performed. A cryptographic provider can then be identified based at least in part on the key identifier for the private key. A request is subsequently sent to the cryptographic provider to perform the cryptographic operation on the data using the private key. A response is then received from the cryptographic provider and sent to the client application.