Cryptographic Token Blinding for Distributed Ledger Privacy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current platforms supporting digital assets on blockchain-like systems lack comprehensive protection for financial institutions, leading to regulatory concerns and hesitation from institutional investors to adopt distributed ledgers for their transaction businesses.

Innovation Solution

A distributed system for executing transactional workflows using a shared append-only ledger with a Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) pattern, which includes a ledger writer for recording transactions and a ledger reader for detecting notifications, along with an audit unit for ensuring authorization and exclusion of contradicting agreements, utilizing cryptographic hashes and unique shared secrets for security and privacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a distributed ledger system is implemented to eliminate central intermediaries and enable peer-to-peer transactions, then transparency and fraud resistance are improved, but regulatory compliance and institutional investor protection deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud resistanceVSAvoidregulatory compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the ledger system into public and private components. The public ledger maintains transparency and fraud resistance, while private ledgers provide regulated access controls and data protection. This segmentation allows different portions of the system to serve different functional requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces regulated intermediaries (such as custodians and authorized entities) that mediate between institutional investors and the distributed ledger system. These intermediaries provide the regulatory compliance layer while the underlying distributed ledger maintains its transparency and security properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If all participants hold and validate a full copy of the ledger in real time, then trustless operation and integrity validation are improved, but system complexity and computational requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrity validationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different participants to hold different types of ledger copies based on their needs. Full nodes maintain complete ledgers for maximum validation capability, while light clients or regulated participants maintain selective subsets. This differential approach reduces overall system complexity while preserving integrity validation where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If comprehensive data visibility is provided to all participants for audit purposes, then auditability and transparency are improved, but participant privacy and security deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveauditabilityVSAvoidprivacy exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data visibility by creating private ledgers that contain sensitive institutional data accessible only to authorized participants, while public ledgers contain audit-relevant information. This segmentation enables auditability through the public ledger without exposing private data stored in restricted ledgers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts audit-relevant information from private transactions and places it in the public ledger for verification, while keeping the actual sensitive data in private ledgers. This extraction allows auditors to verify transaction validity without accessing the underlying private data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11924350B2Cryptographically enforced partial blinding for distributed system
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 DIGITAL ASSET SWITZERLAND GMBH
  • US11924350B2 patent drawing
  • US11924350B2 patent drawing
  • US11924350B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for selectively transmitting cryptographically signed information to a limited number of parties of an agreement using one or more processors. For each party affected by a decision of a first party, the processors generate a token according to a function of both (i) a cryptographic key of the given party and (ii) a cryptographic key of a second party, and transmit to respective private data stores of each party (a) the first party's decision, (b) the generated token, and (c) an identity of the second party. The decision of the first party and the generated tokens are transmitted to the private data stores of only the parties that are affected by the decision of the first party.