Cryptographic Token Rights Management with Trusted Ledgers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing NFT marketplaces face challenges in managing digital assets securely and addressing copyright concerns, with centralized storage risking data loss and decentralized storage incurring high costs and processing demands, and conventional systems failing to enforce digital rights management effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system using trusted ledgers, such as blockchain, to securely store metadata and digital assets, integrating DRM technology to manage access rights and enforce business conditions, ensuring secure and efficient NFT transactions and asset management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If metadata is stored on a centralized server, then the system is easier to implement and update, but the system becomes vulnerable to data loss and server failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoiddata availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the storage system into two parts: the actual digital asset stored on the decentralized network and the metadata stored on a centralized server. This allows the system to benefit from both centralized ease of implementation and decentralized reliability, as the critical asset data is distributed while metadata management remains centralized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a decentralized network as an intermediary between the centralized server and the digital asset. The network stores cryptographic hashes and references to the actual asset files, creating a reliable bridge that ensures data availability without requiring the server to directly host the assets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If metadata is stored on a decentralized ledger, then data reliability improves, but system complexity and processing demands increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data into two categories with different storage locations: large digital assets are stored on the decentralized network while smaller metadata are stored on the centralized server. This segmentation allows the system to achieve decentralized reliability for critical data without the full complexity of storing everything on-chain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses cryptographic hashes as copies or references of the actual asset data. Instead of storing the full asset on the decentralized ledger, the system stores hashes that point to the actual files stored elsewhere on the network, reducing complexity while maintaining reliability through verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If NFTs do not have DRM protection, then access is more flexible, but copyright rights cannot be enforced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess flexibilityVSAvoidcopyright infringement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic DRM policies that can change based on the user's access rights. The system allows flexible access control where the same NFT can have different usage rights for different users, enabling adaptability while maintaining copyright protection through programmable access conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors and enforces DRM policies. When a user attempts to access or transfer an NFT, the system checks the associated metadata and cryptographic proofs to verify copyright rights, providing feedback that prevents unauthorized actions while allowing legitimate use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If NFTs allow free copying and redistribution, then user freedom increases, but digital rights management becomes ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser freedomVSAvoidrights protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic access control where user freedom is not absolute but conditioned on their rights. The system provides freedom within boundaries, allowing users to access and use NFTs according to their purchased rights while preventing copying and redistribution that would violate copyright protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to monitor NFT transactions and access patterns. When a user attempts to copy or redistribute an NFT beyond their authorized rights, the system detects this through cryptographic verification and blocks the action, maintaining rights protection while allowing legitimate user operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12411913B2Cryptographic token rights management systems and methods using trusted ledgers
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 INTERTRUST TECH CORP
  • US12411913B2 patent drawing
  • US12411913B2 patent drawing
  • US12411913B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to, among other things, systems and methods for securely managing digital assets, products, and/or associated tokens in a dynamic way. Various embodiments disclosed herein may use trusted ledgers to securely record certain assertions relating to the digital assets, products, rightsholders, and/or various ecosystems participants. Such assertions may be used in connection with rights binding, content packaging, management, and/or protection operations in connection with a variety of transactions associated with digital assets, products, and/or associated tokens.