Crystal Oscillator Back-Gate Biasing for Fast Stable Startup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Crystal oscillators face challenges in achieving fast startup times and stable oscillation due to variations in crystal properties, amplifier process variations, and temperature fluctuations, particularly in advanced processing technologies like low-power deep submicron CMOS, where negative resistance is difficult to achieve.

Innovation Solution

A crystal oscillator design that includes a back gate bias control circuit to adjust the body bias of NMOS and PMOS transistors in the inverter, enhancing negative resistance during startup and steady-state operation, using body resistors, controllable current sources, and reference voltage control to optimize performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If a crystal oscillator is designed for fast startup time, then the negative resistance must be sufficiently high to overcome crystal losses quickly, but this requires advanced processing technologies and precise control to maintain stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup timeVSAvoidoscillation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the body bias voltage adjustable and time-dependent. The bias voltage is dynamically changed from a first level during startup to a second level during steady-state operation, allowing the oscillator to optimize negative resistance during startup and then maintain stability during normal operation. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between fast startup and stable oscillation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the body bias voltage parameter of the transistors to control negative resistance. By adjusting the body bias voltage level, the negative resistance of the inverter is optimized during startup to achieve fast oscillation establishment, and then adjusted to maintain stable oscillation during steady-state operation. This parameter change approach directly addresses the startup time versus stability contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If advanced processing technologies like low-power deep submicron CMOS are used, then power consumption is reduced, but achieving sufficient negative resistance becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidnegative resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent compensates for the reduced negative resistance in advanced CMOS technologies by adjusting the body bias voltage parameter. By applying optimized body bias voltages to the NMOS and PMOS transistors, the negative resistance is enhanced to sufficient levels while maintaining the low-power benefits of advanced processing technologies. This allows the oscillator to achieve both low power consumption and reliable oscillation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The body bias control circuit acts as an intermediary that mediates between the low-power CMOS technology and the required negative resistance. The control circuit adjusts the body bias voltages to optimize transistor performance and generate sufficient negative resistance, bridging the gap between the capabilities of advanced CMOS and the requirements of reliable oscillation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If body bias control circuit is added to adjust negative resistance, then startup time is reduced and phase noise performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup timeVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a dynamic body bias control approach where the bias voltage levels are adjusted based on the operational state (startup vs. steady-state). This dynamic control achieves fast startup and improved phase noise performance while keeping the circuit relatively simple by using straightforward voltage level switching rather than complex adaptive control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250247050A1Back gate biasing of crystal oscillators for enhanced negative resistance
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20250247050A1 patent drawing
  • US20250247050A1 patent drawing
  • US20250247050A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for back gate biasing of crystal oscillators for enhanced negative resistance are disclosed herein. In certain embodiments, a crystal oscillator includes a crystal and an inverter having an input connected to a first terminal of the crystal and an output connected to a second terminal of the crystal. The inverter includes an n-type metal oxide semiconductor (NMOS) transistor and a p-type metal oxide semiconductor (PMOS) transistor that serve to invert an input oscillation signal from the crystal. The crystal oscillator further includes a back gate bias control circuit that adjusts a negative resistance of the inverter by controlling a back gate bias of at least one of the NMOS transistor or the PMOS transistor.