Crystalline PPAR-delta Agonist Solid State Forms
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current treatments for diseases or conditions related to PPARδ agonism lack a specific, effective drug targeting PPARδ, which is crucial for metabolic processes and has anti-inflammatory properties.
Innovation Solution
Development of crystalline and amorphous forms of the PPARδ agonist sodium (E)-2-(4-((3-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(4-(3-morpholinoprop-1-yn-1-yl)phenyl)allyl)oxy)-2-methylphenoxy)acetate, including various solid state forms characterized by specific XRPD, DSC, TGA, and FTIR patterns, for modulating PPARδ activity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a PPARδ agonist compound is developed for treating metabolic and inflammatory conditions, then therapeutic efficacy is improved, but drug formulation and stability become more challenging due to the need for specific solid state forms
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by developing multiple crystalline forms (Form 1, Form 2, Form 3) and amorphous forms of the PPARδ agonist compound, each with distinct physical and chemical parameters such as solubility, stability, and bioavailability characteristics. This allows optimization of therapeutic efficacy while managing formulation challenges through selective use of different solid state forms
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs composite materials by creating pharmaceutical compositions that combine the PPARδ agonist compound in specific crystalline or amorphous forms with excipients and other formulation components. These composite formulations are designed to enhance drug delivery, stability, and therapeutic performance while addressing the complexity of formulating a potent PPARδ agonist
2Adaptability or versatility
If multiple crystalline forms of the PPARδ agonist are developed, then manufacturing flexibility and application versatility are improved, but characterization and quality control become more difficult
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by systematically characterizing each crystalline form (Form 1, Form 2, Form 3) and amorphous form as distinct entities with unique identification criteria. Each form is defined by specific XRPD patterns, DSC thermograms, and other characterization data, enabling clear differentiation and quality control despite the multiplicity of forms
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses intermediary characterization techniques such as XRPD, DSC, TGA, and FTIR as mediators to distinguish between different solid state forms of the PPARδ agonist. These analytical methods serve as intermediate tools that translate the complex structural differences between forms into measurable, comparable data for quality control and manufacturing verification
Data Source
AI summary
Described herein is crystalline sodium (E)-2-(4-((3-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(4-(3-morpholinoprop-1-yn-1-yl)phenyl)allyl)oxy)-2-methylphenoxy)acetate, uses of such crystalline material in the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of diseases or conditions that would benefit by administration with a PPARS agonist compound.


