CS Fallback Carrier Selection for Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In LTE networks, circuit switched fallback procedures face challenges in efficiently selecting target UTRAN cells for handover, leading to uneven load distribution across multiple carriers, which can result in service delays and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to select a target UTRAN cell based on load states of carriers, using either available load information to choose the carrier with the lowest load or employing a round robin method to distribute the load evenly, ensuring efficient handover and service provision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple carriers are allocated to a UTRAN cell for CS fallback service, then the service coverage and capacity are improved, but the load distribution becomes uneven and service delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidservice delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic carrier selection based on real-time load states. The eNodeB monitors the load of multiple carriers and dynamically selects the carrier with the lowest load for CS fallback handover, rather than using static allocation. This dynamic adaptation ensures even load distribution and prevents service delays while maintaining the benefit of multiple carriers for expanded service coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If carrier selection is based on load states, then load distribution is balanced and service efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice efficiencyVSAvoidselection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a feedback mechanism where the eNodeB monitors the load states of multiple carriers and uses this information to make informed carrier selection decisions. The load state information is continuously fed back to the selection mechanism, enabling adaptive carrier choice that balances load distribution. This feedback-driven approach improves service efficiency while the complexity is managed through standardized monitoring protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If round robin method is used for carrier selection, then load distribution is evenly balanced, but the responsiveness to actual load conditions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload balanceVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection parameter from fixed round-robin ordering to dynamic load-state-based selection. By monitoring actual carrier load parameters and selecting the carrier with the lowest current load, the system achieves both even load distribution and fast response to changing network conditions. This parameter adaptation allows the system to respond quickly to load variations while maintaining balanced distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8831614B2Load distribution in CS fallback
Publication Date: 2014.09.09 KT CORP
  • US8831614B2 patent drawing
  • US8831614B2 patent drawing
  • US8831614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described embodiments provide a method of a circuit switched (CS) fallback procedure at a first network providing only a packet switched (PS) service. A CS fallback procedure may be initiated upon a receipt of a call associated with a CS service. One of carriers assigned to a second network that provides a circuit switched (CS) service may be selected. Then, a second network cell mapped to a serving cell of the first network and using the selected carrier may be selected as a target cell. The user equipment may be handed over o to the selected second network cell in order to provide a requested CS service.