CSI Feedback Prioritization With Unequal Error Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently reporting channel state information (CSI) with unequal error protection, particularly in 5G NR, where not all messages can be correctly recovered due to unstable channel quality, especially for high-speed moving terminals, and there is a need for prioritization and differential error protection levels for critical and non-critical data.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining priority levels for CSI messages based on predetermined rules and using encoders like Polar codes and Reed-Muller codes to provide unequal error protection (UEP) features, where critical messages are assigned higher error protection levels, ensuring reliable transmission even in unstable channel conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all CSI messages are transmitted with equal error protection, then the system complexity is low and implementation is simple, but critical messages may be lost in unstable channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage transmission reliabilityVSAvoiderror protection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different error protection levels to different messages based on their priority. High-priority messages (e.g., beam selection indicators) receive stronger error protection through mapping to more reliable encoder input bits, while low-priority messages (e.g., co-phasing indicators) receive lesser protection. This differential protection approach ensures that critical messages are reliably transmitted in unstable channel conditions without uniformly increasing complexity for all messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If higher error protection is applied to all messages, then message reliability improves, but spectral efficiency decreases due to increased redundancy

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCSI message recovery reliabilityVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by applying error protection selectively only to high-priority messages that require reliable transmission. By mapping high-priority messages to encoder input bits with higher protection levels and low-priority messages to bits with lower protection levels, the system achieves reliable recovery of critical information without adding redundant protection to all messages, thereby maintaining spectral efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If more resources are allocated for error protection, then message accuracy improves, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage transmission accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption for transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allocating error protection resources selectively to high-priority messages that require accurate transmission. The encoder maps high-priority messages to input bits that receive stronger protection, while low-priority messages use fewer protection resources. This approach ensures transmission accuracy for critical messages without unnecessarily consuming power for protecting all messages equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If differential error protection is implemented for different messages, then critical information is reliably transmitted, but the encoding and decoding complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical message transmission reliabilityVSAvoidencoder and decoder complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying the error protection level parameter across different messages based on their priority. The encoder assigns different protection levels to different input bit positions, and the decoder correspondsingly applies different decoding strategies. This parameter-based differentiation enables reliable transmission of critical messages while managing complexity through systematic parameter assignment rather than complex structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11121814B2Techniques of CSI feedback with unequal error protection messages
Publication Date: 2021.09.14 MEDIATEK INC
  • US11121814B2 patent drawing
  • US11121814B2 patent drawing
  • US11121814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an aspect of the disclosure, a method, a computer-readable medium, and an apparatus are provided. The apparatus may be a UE. The UE determines priority levels of a plurality of messages based on at least one predetermined rule. The plurality of messages contain channel state information to be reported to a base station. The at least one predetermined rule specifies that a message including an indicator indicating at least one of a beam selection at a particular dimension and an orthogonal beam group selection has a priority level higher than a priority level of a message including an indicator indicating at least one of a beam direction from a group of beam candidates or co-phasing between two sets of antennas for two polarizations. The UE sends, to the base station, one or more messages of the plurality of messages based on the priority levels of the plurality of messages.