CSI Reporting Prioritization for 5G Massive MIMO

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In MIMO networks, particularly 5G massive MIMO networks, efficiently communicating channel state information (CSI) is challenging due to the large number of antennas and varying channel coefficients, which affects resource allocation and transmission efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where channel coefficients are prioritized based on their tap distances from the most significant tap, with the most significant coefficient assigned the highest priority, and other coefficients assigned based on their proximity, using a prioritization algorithm to selectively include or exclude them from the CSI report, depending on available resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all channel coefficients are included in the CSI report, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel state information accuracyVSAvoidCSI report processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most significant channel coefficients from the complete set of channel coefficients. By identifying and selecting coefficients with the largest magnitudes (those that contribute most to channel response accuracy), the system reduces CSI report size while maintaining measurement precision. This extraction principle directly resolves the contradiction by filtering out less important coefficients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by treating different channel coefficients differently based on their significance. Instead of uniform inclusion, the system assigns varying priorities to coefficients based on their tap distances and magnitudes, including high-priority coefficients while excluding low-priority ones. This selective approach optimizes the balance between accuracy and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If more channel coefficients are reported, then reliability is improved, but loss of time and resource allocation efficiency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidCSI reporting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential channel coefficients needed for reliable communication. By identifying coefficients with tap distances greater than a threshold and selecting those with largest magnitudes, the system reduces the number of coefficients reported, thereby reducing CSI reporting time while maintaining sufficient reliability for effective channel estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by reporting a subset of channel coefficients rather than all coefficients. The system determines that reporting the most significant coefficients (those with largest magnitudes and relevant tap distances) is sufficient for reliable communication, avoiding the time cost of processing and reporting all coefficients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If channel coefficients with larger tap distances are prioritized, then adaptability to multipath propagation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultipath propagation adaptabilityVSAvoidprioritization algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different priority levels to channel coefficients based on their tap distances from the most significant tap. Coefficients with larger tap distances (which capture delayed multipath components) are given higher priority for inclusion. This differentiated treatment enhances adaptability to multipath propagation while keeping the prioritization rule relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of tap distance as the basis for prioritization. By using tap distance from the most significant tap as the sorting criterion (along with coefficient magnitude), the system adapts to multipath propagation characteristics without requiring complex algorithms, simply leveraging the physical meaning of tap distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11152994B1Communication of channel state information (CSI) in wireless networks
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 APPLE INC
  • US11152994B1 patent drawing
  • US11152994B1 patent drawing
  • US11152994B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The systems, methods, and apparatuses can receive one or more communication signals traversing through a communication channel. The systems, methods, and apparatuses can estimate one or more known parameters, characteristics, and/or attributes of the communication channel, for example, scattering, fading, and/or power decay over distance, through a process referred to as channel estimation. The systems, methods, and apparatuses can develop various channel coefficients, for example, amplitudes and/or phases, describing the channel response of the communication channel at discrete intervals of time, also referred to as taps. The systems, methods, and apparatuses can assign taps to various priorities and, thereafter, utilize these priorities to selectively include their corresponding channel coefficients in a CSI report or exclude their corresponding channel coefficients from the CSI report.