CSI Report Prioritization for PUCCH Capacity Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 3GPP-LTE networks, user equipment (UE) has limited packet transmission capacity, leading to constraints in providing effective feedback to the radio access network (RAN) for improving communication quality, particularly in downlink scheduling and interference management.

Innovation Solution

The UE determines which channel status information (CSI) reports to transmit by prioritizing reporting types, serving cell indices, and CSI sub-frame sets within the physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) packets, allowing for efficient selection and dropping of CSI reports to avoid collisions and optimize feedback transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the UE transmits multiple CSI reports in PUCCH packets, then the feedback quality for downlink scheduling and interference management is improved, but the limited packet transmission capacity of the UE is exceeded causing collisions and loss of feedback information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback qualityVSAvoidpacket transmission capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feedback transmission by dividing CSI reports into different priority levels (first priority, second priority, third priority). This segmentation allows the UE to handle multiple CSI reports with limited capacity by transmitting higher priority reports first, preventing capacity overflow while maintaining essential feedback quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different priorities to different CSI reports based on their importance. Critical CSI reports (e.g., those for active downlink carriers) receive higher priority and are guaranteed transmission, while less critical reports receive lower priority. This ensures that limited transmission capacity is allocated to the most important feedback information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the UE prioritizes certain CSI reports over others, then the critical feedback information is transmitted effectively, but the complexity of determining priority and selecting reports increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical CSI transmission reliabilityVSAvoidreport selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring priority levels for different CSI reports before transmission. The UE and eNodeB agree on priority assignments in advance, so when multiple CSI reports need to be transmitted, the UE can automatically select which reports to send based on pre-established priority rules without complex real-time decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by introducing a priority parameter that categorizes CSI reports. This simple parameter change transforms the complex problem of selecting which CSI reports to transmit into a straightforward comparison of priority values, significantly reducing the computational complexity at the UE.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10362504B2Periodic channel status information (CSI) reporting for enhanced interference management and traffic adaptation (EIMTA) systems with CSI subframe sets
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 APPLE INC
  • US10362504B2 patent drawing
  • US10362504B2 patent drawing
  • US10362504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Wireless device, method, and computer readable media are disclosed for determining which channel status information (CSI) report of a user equipment (UE) to drop from a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) packet. The method may include determining that a first CSI report and a second CSI report are to be sent in the PUCCH, where the first CSI report has a first reporting type and a first CSI sub-frame set, and the second CSI report has a second reporting type and a second CSI sub-frame set. The method may include determining to drop the first CSI report if the first CSI sub-frame set has a second lower priority than the second CSI sub-frame set. The determination to drop may be further based on a CSI processor index, serving cell index, and the CSI report priority.