Multi-Level CSI Reporting for 5G Beam Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 5G communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing channel state information (CSI) reports, particularly in high-frequency bands where propagation losses and signal blockages are significant, affecting beamforming and coverage.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a multi-level CSI report mechanism and beam constraint window configuration in user equipment (UE) to optimize CSI reporting, allowing for periodic and semi-persistent transmissions, and dynamic beam management to enhance channel quality feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multi-level CSI report mechanism is implemented, then CSI reporting accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCSI reporting accuracyVSAvoidUE complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The CSI report is divided into multiple levels (first level, second level, third level) with different granularities. Each level reports different aspects of channel state information with varying detail, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy through aggregated multi-level reports while keeping individual report complexities manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension by implementing periodic and semi-persistent reporting mechanisms. Channel state information is reported across multiple time instances with different levels of detail, enabling accurate channel tracking over time while distributing the reporting complexity across multiple less-intensive reports rather than requiring one comprehensive report.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If beam constraint window configuration is implemented, then beam alignment accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam alignment accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam constraint window configuration applies different quality requirements to different time intervals. During beam training phases, higher precision beam measurement is applied within constrained windows, while other periods use relaxed configurations. This local differentiation achieves high beam alignment accuracy where needed without maintaining high processing complexity continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Beam constraint windows are configured periodically rather than continuously. The UE performs detailed beam measurements and reporting only during these periodic windows, achieving accurate beam alignment when necessary while reducing processing complexity between windows through lighter monitoring requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of information

If periodic and semi-persistent CSI reporting is enabled, then channel quality feedback is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel quality feedbackVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses partial action by implementing semi-persistent reporting that activates only when channel conditions change significantly or periodically, rather than continuous reporting. This provides sufficient channel quality feedback to maintain link reliability while avoiding the excessive signaling overhead of uninterrupted reporting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The reporting mechanism dynamically changes parameters such as reporting periodicity, frequency, and detail level based on channel conditions, traffic requirements, and beam status. When channels are stable, reporting is reduced; when changes are detected, reporting intensity increases. This adaptive parameter adjustment ensures adequate feedback while minimizing overall signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3529913B1Method and apparatus for channel state information report in wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2023.07.12 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP3529913B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3529913B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3529913B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a pre-5th-Generation (5G) or 5G communication system to be provided for supporting higher data rates Beyond 4th-Generation (4G) communication system such as Long Term Evolution (LTE). A method for reporting channel information by a user equipment (UE) is provided. The method comprises receiving, by the UE, configuration information from a base station (BS), the configuration information indicating K channel state information (CSI) reference signal (RS) resources configured, by the BS, for measurement by the UE; measuring, by the UE, a layer one (L1) reference signal received power (RSRP) for one or more of the K CSI-RS resources; selecting, by the UE, N CSI-RS resources of the K CSI-RS resources for reporting in a reporting instance; generating, by the UE, a report for the N CSI-RS resources, the generated report including a CSI-RS resource index (CRI) for each of the N CSI-RS resources, a L1-RSRP value for one of the N CSI-RS resources having a largest L1-RSRP, and a differential L1-RSRP value for each of the other of the N CSI-RS resources; and transmitting, by the UE, the generated report to the BS in the reporting instance.