CT Image Artifact Correction Using Dual CNN Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computed tomography (CT) images often suffer from artifacts such as beam hardening and bone-induced artifacts, which blur the image and reduce diagnostic power, with existing correction techniques being complex and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using a trained machine learning model, specifically a two-step convolutional neural network (CNN), to identify and correct low and high frequency artifacts in CT images without relying on X-ray spectrum information or detector data, employing U-shape and residual networks to generate a target image.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional artifact correction algorithms are used, then artifact correction can be achieved, but the processing time is long and complexity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact correction effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional iterative artifact correction algorithms with a trained neural network model that processes images in a single forward pass. The neural network, trained on paired artifact-containing and artifact-free images, learns to directly map artifact-ridden images to corrected versions, eliminating the need for time-consuming iterative optimization and achieving both high correction effectiveness and fast processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the neural network model using large datasets of artifact-containing and artifact-free image pairs before actual correction tasks. This pre-training phase enables the model to learn artifact patterns and correction mappings in advance, so that during actual use, only a single forward propagation is needed without iterative refinement, dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining correction quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional artifact correction algorithms are used, then artifact correction can be achieved, but the algorithm complexity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact correction effectivenessVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex iterative correction algorithms with a trained neural network that performs correction through a single forward pass. The neural network architecture (such as U-Net or residual networks) with appropriate loss functions provides a unified, elegant solution that is both conceptually simpler and computationally more efficient than traditional iterative methods, while achieving superior or comparable correction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the artifact correction problem from an iterative optimization process with multiple adjustable parameters into a direct mapping problem solved by a neural network with fixed weights after training. By changing from algorithmic parameter tuning to learned parameter representation, the system achieves simpler implementation and faster execution while maintaining or improving correction quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If single model artifact correction is used, then processing is simpler, but accuracy for different artifact types is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection process simplicityVSAvoidartifact correction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the artifact correction task into multiple specialized neural network models, each trained on specific types of artifacts (e.g., beam hardening, metal artifacts, motion artifacts). This segmentation allows each model to specialize in detecting and correcting its target artifact type with high precision, while the overall system remains simple through modular architecture and automated artifact type classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11508102B2Systems and methods for image processing
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE
  • US11508102B2 patent drawing
  • US11508102B2 patent drawing
  • US11508102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is related to systems and methods for image processing. The method may include obtaining an image including at least one of a first type of artifact or a second type of artifact. The method may include determining, based on a trained machine learning model, at least one of first information associated with the first type of artifact or second information associated with the second type of artifact in the image. The trained machine learning model may include a first trained model and a second trained model. The first trained model may be configured to determine the first information. The second trained model may be configured to determine the second information. The method may include generating a target image based on at least part of the first information and the second information.