Photon Counting CT Detector Bad Pixel Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Photon counting CT systems face challenges with 'bad' detector pixels due to issues like noisy counting background, abnormal energy resolution, and nonlinear response, which affect image quality and require complex calibration, especially in semiconductor-based detectors prone to pulse pile-up and material non-uniformity.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for diagnosing and calibrating underperforming pixels in a small pixelated photon counting CT system through in-situ tests during calibration scans, identifying and interpolating data from surrounding pixels to create 'bad' pixel tables for spectral and counting images, allowing for image quality improvement by excluding or correcting faulty pixels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If semiconductor-based photon counting detectors are used to achieve spectral CT capability and high resolution, then image quality and material differentiation are improved, but pulse pile-up effects and nonlinear response distort the detector energy response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral resolutionVSAvoiddetector response linearity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing bad pixel identification and correction during calibration scans before actual patient imaging. The system pre-identifies underperforming pixels and creates correction maps that are applied during reconstruction, preventing artifacts from affecting diagnostic images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operational parameters by adjusting energy thresholds and applying nonlinear correction factors based on calibration data. The system modifies detection parameters dynamically to compensate for pulse pile-up effects and maintain accurate spectral measurements across varying flux conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If detector pixels are made smaller to increase spatial resolution, then image detail is improved, but the number of bad pixels increases due to manufacturing non-uniformity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidpixel performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the detector array into individual pixel units that can be independently evaluated and corrected. Each pixel's performance is assessed separately during calibration, allowing precise identification of underperforming elements without affecting neighboring pixels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by applying pixel-specific correction factors and individual bad pixel masks rather than uniform corrections across the entire detector. Each pixel receives tailored compensation based on its specific performance characteristics measured during calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If complex calibration procedures are implemented to correct bad pixel effects, then image quality is improved, but calibration time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs calibration during routine system operation rather than requiring separate dedicated calibration sessions. Bad pixel identification is integrated into normal scanning protocols using phantom or patient data, eliminating separate calibration time from the workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically identifying bad pixels and generating correction maps without requiring manual intervention or specialized calibration procedures. The calibration process is autonomous and uses readily available scanning data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If bad pixels are excluded from processing to maintain image quality, then artifact reduction is achieved, but data loss occurs and requires interpolation from surrounding pixels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoiddetector data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of bad pixel data through interpolation from neighboring healthy pixels. Rather than simply discarding bad pixel measurements, the system reconstructs plausible values by copying and adapting data from surrounding pixels, preserving spatial continuity in the final image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances image quality by accurately identifying and correcting underperforming pixels, reducing artifacts like ring/band artifacts and maintaining consistent image quality over the system's lifetime by interpolating data from neighboring pixels.

Implementation Method 1

the semiconductor based detector using direct conversion is employed to resolve the energy of the individual incoming photons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a charge cloud is formed and drifts toward the anode under the applied electric field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharge drift: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS11782176B2Bad detector calibration methods and workflow for a small pixelated photon counting CT system
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 CANON MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US11782176B2 patent drawing
  • US11782176B2 patent drawing
  • US11782176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for diagnosing and/or calibrating underperforming pixels in detectors in a small pixelated photon counting CT system utilizes a series of tests on image data acquired in-situ as part of a series of calibration scans in the CT system. Tests are performed on the acquired data to determine the existence of underperforming pixels within the detectors such that the information acquired by those pixels can be replaced by alternate data from surrounding pixels (e.g. by interpolation). The underperforming pixels are stored in “bad” pixel tables and may be specific to a type of image (e.g., spectral or counting) and a specific protocol.