X-ray CT Edge Artifact Correction via Phantom Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing X-ray CT apparatuses using photon counting detectors face challenges in suppressing artifacts near the edge of a test subject due to the influence of half shadows and scattered rays, which are not adequately addressed by current calibration methods.

Innovation Solution

An X-ray CT apparatus and correction method that create and utilize correction data based on difference data between measurement and calculation projection data for each X-ray energy, obtained by photographing a known phantom with a known composition and shape smaller than the imaging field, to correct projection data and reduce artifacts near the edge of a test subject.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If stepped phantoms with acrylic and aluminum plates are used for calibration, then calibration data for multiple materials can be obtained, but artifacts generated in the vicinity of the edge portion of the test subject cannot be suppressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration data accuracyVSAvoidedge artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The phantom is segmented into multiple regions: a central region with stepped plates for material calibration and peripheral regions with edge portions for artifact correction. This segmentation allows separate optimization of calibration accuracy and artifact suppression by using different phantom regions for different purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The edge portion of the phantom acts as an intermediary element that captures half-shadow and scattered ray effects. By measuring these effects on the known edge portion and subtracting them from the test subject images, the harmful artifacts are eliminated while preserving the diagnostic information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the phantom size covers all detection elements, then complete detector calibration is achieved, but the influences of half shadows and scattered rays at the edge portion cannot be grasped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector calibrationVSAvoidedge effect information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The phantom design extends into the spatial dimension by creating a size mismatch between the phantom and the detector array. The phantom is deliberately made smaller than the full detector coverage, creating peripheral detection elements that only receive X-rays from the phantom's edge portions, thereby capturing half-shadow and scattered ray information that would be lost with full-coverage phantoms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If correction data is created using difference data between measurement and calculation projection data, then artifacts can be suppressed, but additional processing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact suppressionVSAvoidcorrection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Correction data is pre-calculated and stored during the phantom calibration phase. The correction data, which contains the characteristic half-shadow and scattered ray patterns of the phantom's edge portions, is computed in advance and saved for later use. During actual patient imaging, this pre-computed correction data is simply subtracted from the projection data, significantly reducing the computational burden and complexity of real-time artifact correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively suppresses artifacts near the edge of a test subject, improving the accuracy of medical images by accounting for half shadows and scattered rays through the use of correction data.

Implementation Method 1

a photon counting type detector can measure X-ray energies that are the energies of incident X-ray photons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

measurement projection data for each X-ray energy obtained by photographing a known phantom having a known composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS12144663B2X-ray CT apparatus and correction method of projection data
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US12144663B2 patent drawing
  • US12144663B2 patent drawing
  • US12144663B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An X-ray CT apparatus and a correction method of projection data that are capable of suppressing artifacts generated in the vicinity of an edge portion of a test subject are provided. The X-ray CT apparatus for photographing a test subject is characterized by comprising: a correction data creation unit that creates correction data using difference data between measurement projection data for each X-ray energy obtained by photographing a known phantom having a known composition, a known shape, and a size smaller than a photographing field of view of the X-ray CT apparatus and calculation projection data for each X-ray energy calculated on the basis of X-ray transmission lengths obtained from the shape of the known phantom; and a correction unit that corrects projection data for each X-ray energy of the test subject using the correction data.