X-ray CT Controller Exposure State Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing X-ray CT apparatuses face challenges in accurately determining whether projection data is collected during X-ray exposure, leading to errors in image reconstruction and dose calculation, especially due to variations in reference detector count values and unstable X-ray tube conditions.

Innovation Solution

The X-ray CT apparatus includes a controller that adds additional information about X-ray exposure state to each projection data set, allowing precise determination of exposure timing and voltage/current values, ensuring accurate collection of data during X-ray exposure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a reference detector is used to determine X-ray exposure state, then exposure timing can be identified, but determination accuracy deteriorates due to detector variations and X-ray tube instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure timing determination accuracyVSAvoiddetermination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the actual X-ray output value (mA value) detected during exposure as feedback to determine whether projection data was collected during X-ray exposure. This feedback mechanism replaces the unreliable reference detector threshold method with direct measurement of the actual exposure condition, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary parameter (actual X-ray output value/mA value) that mediates between the X-ray tube output and the projection data collection status. This intermediary provides a reliable indicator of exposure state that is not affected by reference detector variations or offset values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If threshold-based determination is used for Ref detector count values, then exposure state can be classified, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to individual detector differences and offset values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure state classificationVSAvoidexposure determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter used for exposure determination from reference detector count values to actual X-ray output values (mA values). This parameter change eliminates the problems of individual detector differences and offset values, as the actual output value directly reflects the X-ray tube's exposure state without requiring threshold classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If X-ray output is modulated during scanning, then imaging flexibility increases, but dose calculation accuracy deteriorates because actual mA values cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging flexibilityVSAvoiddose calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/threshold-based determination system with an electrical measurement system that directly reads the actual X-ray output value (mA value). This substitution allows accurate dose calculation even when X-ray output is modulated, as the actual instantaneous mA value is measured and recorded for each projection data set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more accurate determination of X-ray exposure states, ensuring only valid projection data is used for image reconstruction and allowing precise calculation of exposure dose, even during modulated X-ray output and unstable tube conditions.

Implementation Method 1

an X-ray generator; an X-ray detector, arranged opposite to said X-ray generator by sandwiching a subject, configured to collect, as projection data, X-rays that have been exposed from said X-ray generator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray generation: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

an X-ray detector, arranged opposite to said X-ray generator by sandwiching a subject, configured to collect, as projection data, X-rays that have been exposed from said X-ray generator and transmitted through said subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8279999B2X-ray CT apparatus and a method of controlling the X-ray CT apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.10.02 TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US8279999B2 patent drawing
  • US8279999B2 patent drawing
  • US8279999B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An X-ray CT apparatus includes an X-ray generator and an X-ray detector. The X-ray generator and the X-ray detector rotate about a subject. A controller controls the timing of exposing X-rays from the X-ray generator. The controller controls the collection timing for the projection data used by the X-ray detector and causes the X-ray detector to continuously collect the projection data at the specified collection timing. The controller causes additional information representing the state of exposure of the X-rays to be added to each projection data that has been collected by the X-ray detector at said specified collection timing.