CT-Guided Component Repair With Adaptive Additive Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing manufacturing processes for components, such as those in gas turbine engines, face challenges in reducing material waste and manufacturing costs, particularly in repairing or overhauling defects using braze material or weld filler.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using computed tomography to scan and process data for additive manufacturing and machining, allowing for precise deposition and removal of material to form a component, utilizing an automated system that includes an additive manufacturing device and a machining tool to create or repair components based on reference data, thereby optimizing material usage and reducing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional braze material or weld filler processes are used to repair defects, then defects can be overhauled, but material waste and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect repair capabilityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using CT scan data to identify precise defect locations and applying material deposition only to those specific areas rather than treating the entire component. The machining operations are also localized to only the regions requiring correction, minimizing unnecessary material waste while effectively repairing defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the repair process by transitioning from traditional bulk material application to precision material deposition guided by CT scan data. The process parameters include controlled material deposition amounts, precise positioning based on scan data, and adaptive machining parameters that vary according to the specific defect characteristics and required correction levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional braze material or weld filler processes are used to repair defects, then defects can be overhauled, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect repair capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using CT scan data to continuously monitor and guide the material deposition and machining processes. The scan data provides real-time information about defect locations, dimensions, and characteristics, allowing the system to adjust material application and machining parameters dynamically, thereby optimizing resource usage and reducing costs while maintaining repair quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by creating a closed-loop system where the component's own CT scan data guides its repair process. The scan data automatically identifies defects and generates the information needed for precise material deposition and machining, reducing the need for manual inspection and decision-making while ensuring accurate and cost-effective repairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If CT scan data is used to guide additive manufacturing and machining, then material deposition accuracy is improved, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial deposition accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using a single CT scanning system to perform multiple functions: identifying defects, determining material deposition parameters, and guiding machining operations. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be multiple separate inspection and control systems into one unified process, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high precision material deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the adaptive manufacturing of components with reduced waste and costs by ensuring accurate material deposition and removal, effectively restoring components to a like-new condition, tailored to specific defects and designs.

Implementation Method 1

scanning the substrate using computed tomography to provide substrate scan data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComputed tomography: Tomography

Implementation Method 2

The additive manufacturing may include laser metal deposition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser metal deposition: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS20240085350A1Adaptive manufacturing using CT scan data
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US20240085350A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085350A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085350A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for providing a component. During this method, a first object is additive manufactured. The first object is scanned using computed tomography to provide first object scan data. The first object scan data is compared to first object reference data to provide machining data. The first object is machined using the machining data to provide a second object.