CT Image Processing Edge-Preserving Denoising Spike Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heavy-tailed noise in CT images, particularly in Photon Counting CT systems and low-dose scans, leads to increased spike occurrence after denoising, resulting in false-positive spike identifications and loss of texture and contrast.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for image-processing of CT images that involves pre-processing steps using an edge-preserving denoising algorithm, followed by an adaptive spike suppression algorithm to reduce the number of spikes while maintaining image texture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If edge-preserving denoising is applied to remove noise, then noise reduction is achieved, but the number of spikes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidspike occurrence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing edge-preserving denoising before spike suppression. The denoising step is performed first to reduce noise and improve the signal-to-noise ratio, which makes subsequent spike identification and suppression more effective. This preliminary processing prepares the image data for the following spike removal step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes spikes from the image data using an adaptive spike suppression algorithm. After denoising, the algorithm identifies and extracts spike artifacts from the pre-processed image, separating them from the actual tissue structures. This extraction process removes the harmful spike components while preserving the underlying image information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If spike suppression is applied to remove spikes, then spike number is reduced, but texture and contrast are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespike numberVSAvoidtexture and contrast
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs edge-preserving denoising as a preliminary step before spike suppression. This preliminary denoising improves the signal-to-noise ratio and enhances the distinguishability of spikes from actual tissue structures. As a result, the subsequent spike suppression algorithm can more accurately identify and remove only the spike artifacts while preserving genuine tissue texture and contrast information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs an adaptive spike suppression algorithm that uses feedback mechanisms to dynamically adjust its processing based on the image characteristics. The algorithm continuously monitors the image data and adapts its suppression strength and criteria, allowing it to remove spikes while preserving important tissue structures and maintaining texture and contrast information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If denoising is applied to improve signal-to-noise ratio, then noise is reduced, but false-positive spike identifications increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidspike identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies edge-preserving denoising as a preliminary step that improves the signal-to-noise ratio by removing random noise while preserving edges and structures. This enhanced signal quality provides a better foundation for subsequent spike identification, reducing false-positive identifications by making the true spike structures more distinguishable from the background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The adaptive spike suppression algorithm incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously evaluate the image characteristics and adjust identification criteria accordingly. This feedback loop allows the algorithm to learn from the denoised image structure and refine its spike detection, improving accuracy by adapting to the specific tissue patterns and reducing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250061549A1Method for image-processing of CT images
Publication Date: 2025.02.20 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US20250061549A1 patent drawing
  • US20250061549A1 patent drawing
  • US20250061549A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a computer-implemented method for image-processing of CT images, the method comprising performing one or more pre-processing steps on a CT image so as to obtain a pre-processed CT image, wherein the one or more pre-processing steps comprise applying an edge-preserving denoising algorithm; and performing an adaptive spike suppression algorithm on the pre-processed CT image to obtain a processed CT image, the adaptive spike suppression algorithm being configured such that the processed CT image has a reduced number of spikes as compared to the pre-processed CT image.