CT Motion Estimation and Compensation via Fourier Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional CT image reconstruction methods fail to effectively address motion artifacts in cardiac imaging due to the heart's movement, leading to image blurring and incorrect diagnoses, especially for small features like coronary artery plaques, and existing techniques are costly or mechanically restrictive.

Innovation Solution

A CT imaging system and method that includes data acquisition and image processing to identify regions of interest, apply directional filters to estimate motion paths, and compensate for motion by modulating the Fourier space with motion vectors, reducing the need for extensive scan data and minimizing radiation exposure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional CT image reconstruction methods are used, then the imaging process is simple and fast, but motion artifacts cause image blurring and reduce diagnostic accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidreconstruction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by estimating motion parameters before the actual image reconstruction. The motion estimation is performed on the raw projection data or initial reconstructions, and then these motion parameters are used to guide the reconstruction process, allowing the system to compensate for motion effects proactively rather than reactively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces motion parameter estimation as an intermediary step between data acquisition and final image reconstruction. This intermediary process extracts motion information that serves as a mediator to adjust and optimize the reconstruction, enabling the system to handle motion artifacts without fundamentally changing the reconstruction algorithm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If brute force approaches like employing two X-ray tubes or higher power tubes are used, then motion artifacts are reduced, but the cost and mechanical complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidscanner mechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical solutions (additional X-ray tubes, higher power tubes, faster gantry spinning) with a computational approach. Instead of physically changing the hardware to handle motion, the system uses software-based motion estimation and compensation algorithms to achieve the same goal, thereby reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining image quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the reconstruction process by introducing motion parameter estimation. Rather than changing the physical parameters of the scanner (X-ray power, gantry speed), the system adjusts reconstruction parameters based on estimated motion, achieving motion compensation through parameter optimization rather than hardware modification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple phase reconstructions are performed to select quiescent phase images, then motion artifacts are reduced, but temporal resolution becomes insufficient for high heart rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidtemporal resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the reconstruction process adaptive to the actual motion characteristics. Instead of using fixed multiple phase reconstructions, the system dynamically estimates motion parameters and adjusts the reconstruction strategy accordingly, allowing it to handle varying heart rates and motion patterns effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the estimated motion parameters to guide and optimize the reconstruction process. The motion estimation provides feedback about the actual motion occurring during the scan, which is then used to adjust reconstruction parameters and select optimal images, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to real-time conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If model-based estimation requiring several cardiac phase reconstructions is used, then motion compensation improves, but X-ray exposure time increases and computational challenges arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion compensation accuracyVSAvoidX-ray exposure time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by estimating motion parameters using only a subset of the available data or a simplified approach rather than requiring complete multi-phase reconstructions. This partial estimation is sufficient to achieve effective motion compensation while significantly reducing the total X-ray exposure time and computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2357613B1Method for computed tomography motion estimation and compensation
Publication Date: 2014.09.10 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2357613B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2357613B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2357613B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A method and system (10) for motion estimation and compensation are disclosed. Initially, a set of one or more initial images is reconstructed using acquired imaging data. Further, one or more regions of interest are identified in this set of reconstructed initial images. At least a set of filters (402, 404, 406) is applied to the identified regions of interest to generate a sequence of filtered images. Particularly, each of the filtered images in the generated sequence of filtered images includes data acquired near a different reference point. Subsequently, a motion path corresponding to each region of interest is determined based on one or more correspondences in the sequence of filtered images.