CT Iterative Reconstruction Axial Artifact Reduction via Data Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Iterative reconstruction techniques in cone beam CT imaging face challenges in reducing axial artifacts due to insufficiently measured data, leading to inaccuracies in reconstructed images, especially in regions not fully irradiated by X-rays during circular cone beam scanning.

Innovation Solution

The system expands the projection data in the z-direction by adding additional rows of data and applies specific weighting functions to validate and prioritize the measured data during the iterative reconstruction process, using techniques like OS-SART and TV minimization, to reduce axial artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If iterative reconstruction is applied to cone beam data, then image reconstruction is achieved, but axial artifacts increase due to insufficiently measured data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage reconstruction accuracyVSAvoidaxial artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing data expansion and weighting before the iterative reconstruction process. Specifically, the measured data is expanded to include additional axial coverage, and weighting functions are applied to prioritize accurately measured data regions. This preliminary preparation ensures that when iterative reconstruction proceeds, the algorithm has access to properly weighted data that minimizes axial artifacts from the beginning of the reconstruction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by applying spatially varying weighting functions to different regions of the projection data. The weighting scheme assigns higher weights to data regions with sufficient measurement coverage and lower weights to regions with insufficient coverage. This localized differentiation allows the reconstruction algorithm to prioritize reliable data while minimizing the impact of insufficiently measured regions, thereby reducing axial artifacts in the final image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If data expansion is performed to increase axial coverage, then more complete data coverage is achieved, but data accuracy may decrease in expanded regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata coverage completenessVSAvoiddata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the weighting parameter across different data regions. The weighting function varies spatially, with parameters adjusted to reflect the reliability of measurements in each region. This parameter modulation allows the system to maintain high accuracy in well-measured regions while still incorporating expanded coverage regions with appropriate weight reduction, thus balancing completeness and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by applying different weighting characteristics to different regions of the expanded data. Accurately measured regions receive higher weights while expanded regions receive lower weights. This localized quality differentiation ensures that the final reconstruction prioritizes accurate data while still benefiting from the expanded axial coverage, effectively resolving the trade-off between completeness and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If conventional circular cone beam scanning is used, then scanning simplicity is maintained, but regions A are not sufficiently irradiated leading to reconstruction failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning simplicityVSAvoidregion irradiation completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary element in the form of data expansion and weighting functions that bridge the gap between the simple circular scanning geometry and the need for complete region coverage. Rather than modifying the physical scanning path, the intermediary data processing steps compensate for the insufficient irradiation of regions A by expanding the projection data and applying appropriate weights during reconstruction, thus maintaining scanning simplicity while achieving complete coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by preparing the projection data through expansion and weighting before reconstruction. This preliminary data preparation compensates for the incomplete irradiation of regions A that results from the simple circular scanning geometry. By pre-processing the data to include expanded axial coverage and apply weighting functions, the system overcomes the limitations of the simple scan without requiring complex scanning trajectories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces axial artifacts in reconstructed images by ensuring more comprehensive data coverage and accurate weighting, resulting in improved image quality, as demonstrated by reduced inaccuracies in regions previously affected by insufficient data.

Implementation Method 1

The system expands the projection data in the z-direction by adding additional rows of data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectData expansion:

Implementation Method 2

applies specific weighting functions to validate and prioritize the measured data during the iterative reconstruction process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWeighting function application:

Implementation Method 3

using techniques like OS-SART and TV minimization, to reduce axial artifacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIterative reconstruction:

Data Source

PatentUS8712134B2Method and system for expanding axial coverage in iterative reconstruction in computer tomography (CT)
Publication Date: 2014.04.29 TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US8712134B2 patent drawing
  • US8712134B2 patent drawing
  • US8712134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The image generation method and system generates an image using a predetermined iterative reconstruction technique from cone beam data that has been expanded by adding additional data, and an instance of the iteration process is weighted according to a corresponding validation weight during the reconstruction. Optionally, an instance of the iteration process is weighted according to a combination of weights during the reconstruction. The predetermined combination of the weights includes axial weights based upon a validity value of the expanded data and statistical weights.