CT Scanner Parameter Selection via Contrast and Noise Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional CT scanners lack guidance for optimal selection of x-ray tube voltage, leading to suboptimal image quality and radiation dosage, due to the complexity of interactions between scanning parameters and the difficulty in adjusting tube voltage to balance image quality and radiation dose.

Innovation Solution

An imaging system with an identification module, analysis module, and determination module that identifies scanning modes, determines image contrast and tolerable noise for various setting combinations, and selects operational settings to optimize diagnostic dosages and image quality, including automatic adjustment of tube voltage and current.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If higher x-ray tube current is used, then image quality is improved, but radiation dosage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidradiation dosage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts tube voltage (kV) and tube current (mA) parameters based on patient attenuation measurements and clinical task requirements. By dynamically changing these parameters rather than using fixed values, the system optimizes the balance between image quality and radiation dosage for each specific scan scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from attenuation measurements and image quality assessments to automatically adjust scanning parameters. The automated parameter selection process incorporates feedback loops that evaluate the relationship between tube voltage, tube current, and resulting image quality to determine optimal settings that minimize radiation while maintaining diagnostic adequacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If tube voltage is adjusted to optimize image quality, then diagnostic capability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic capabilityVSAvoidparameter selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated parameter selection where the scanning system itself determines optimal tube voltage and current settings based on pre-programmed algorithms and clinical guidelines. This self-service approach eliminates the need for practitioners to manually navigate complex parameter interactions, as the system autonomously selects appropriate settings based on patient-specific factors and clinical task requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated parameter selection module as an intermediary between the practitioner and the complex tube voltage/current settings. This intermediary layer translates clinical requirements into specific technical parameters, shielding the user from the complexity of parameter interactions while still achieving optimized image quality and radiation dosage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If conventional fixed tube voltage settings are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but image quality and radiation dosage optimization suffer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter selection easeVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains ease of operation by implementing automated parameter selection that requires minimal user input. The system autonomously determines optimal tube voltage and current settings based on patient attenuation measurements and clinical task parameters, eliminating the need for practitioners to manually adjust complex voltage/current combinations while still achieving optimized image quality and radiation dosage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes tube voltage and current parameters based on real-time attenuation measurements and clinical requirements, rather than using fixed settings. This automated parameter adaptation maintains operational simplicity for the user while achieving optimized imaging outcomes through continuous parameter adjustment based on patient-specific factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces diagnostic dosages, improves the balance between image noise and contrast, and simplifies the selection of tube voltage, allowing for tailored image quality based on patient size, clinical tasks, and practitioner preferences.

Implementation Method 1

As the x-rays pass from the source through the object being imaged, the x-rays become attenuated before impinging upon the detector. The intensity of the attenuated beam radiation received at the detector is responsive to the attenuation of the x-rays by the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS9968307B2Systems and methods for selecting parameters using contrast and noise
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US9968307B2 patent drawing
  • US9968307B2 patent drawing
  • US9968307B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imaging system includes an identification module, an analysis module, and a determination module. The identification module is configured to identify a scanning mode of operation. The analysis module is configured to determine an attenuation for an object for a scan to be performed on the object. The determination module is configured to determine an image contrast for each of plural setting combinations, determine a corresponding tolerable noise for the image contrast for each of the setting combinations based on the scanning mode of operation, and determine a corresponding diagnostic dosage for each setting combination, the diagnostic dosages corresponding to the image contrast and tolerable noise for the corresponding setting combination. The determination module is also configured to select an operational setting for the scan to be performed using the dosages determined.