Scattered Beam Correction in Dual-Source CT

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for scattered beam correction in dual-source CT scans face challenges such as incorrect estimation of scattered beam profiles due to increased z-coverage, require additional hardware, or result in aliasing errors and increased image noise, especially during spiral scanning.

Innovation Solution

An iterative method for determining transverse scattering intensities from reconstructed image data, using variants like calculation from retracing beam paths, surface-based estimation, and Monte Carlo simulations to correct raw data, without additional sensors or hardware demands, allowing for more precise and flexible modeling of transverse scattering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If model-based estimation of scattered radiation is used, then scattered beam correction can be implemented, but the estimation becomes increasingly incorrect with increased z-coverage and pitch during spiral scanning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered beam profile estimation accuracyVSAvoidz-coverage capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D scattered beam profile estimation to 3D estimation by incorporating z-direction information. The scattered beam profile is determined as a function of z-position, allowing the correction to adapt to different z-coverage and pitch values during spiral scanning, thereby resolving the contradiction between estimation accuracy and z-coverage capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for scattered beam estimation by incorporating z-position dependent parameters. Instead of using fixed 2D profiles, the system uses 3D profiles that vary with z-position, allowing the estimation to remain accurate across different scanning conditions including varied pitch and z-coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If dedicated sensors are used to measure scattered radiation, then scattered beam profile can be measured, but additional hardware is required which increases manufacturing costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered beam profile measurement accuracyVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by using the existing detector systems to measure both primary and scattered radiation. The detectors serve dual purposes: capturing primary radiation for image reconstruction and capturing scattered radiation for profile determination. This eliminates the need for dedicated scattered radiation sensors while maintaining measurement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The existing detectors are made multi-functional by using them for both primary radiation detection and scattered radiation measurement. The same detector elements that capture primary beams are also used to detect scattered photons, allowing the system to perform multiple functions with a single hardware component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If alternate blanking of primary radiation is used to measure transverse scattering, then direct measurements can be obtained, but aliasing errors increase and image noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransverse scattering measurement accuracyVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuous data acquisition without blanking the primary radiation. Both primary and scattered radiation are measured continuously during the scan, eliminating the interruptions caused by alternate blanking. This continuous measurement approach prevents aliasing errors and maintains image quality while still enabling scattered radiation measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides an improved approximation of scattered beam intensity, reducing artifacts and noise, and avoiding ambiguities in scattered beam profile estimation, while maintaining dose efficiency and precision in CT image reconstruction.

Implementation Method 1

x-ray quanta on the object to be measured are scattered by an x-ray emitter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray emission: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

x-ray quanta on the object to be measured are scattered by an x-ray emitter of a first emitter detector system into a detector of a second emitter detector system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompton scattering: Compton Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS8744161B2Method and computer system for scattered beam correction in a multi-source CT
Publication Date: 2014.06.03 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US8744161B2 patent drawing
  • US8744161B2 patent drawing
  • US8744161B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a computer system are disclosed for scattered beam correction in a CT examination of an object in a multi source CT. In at least one embodiment, the method includes generating original projection data records; reconstruction of the object with the original projection data records of at least one detector; determining the scattered radiation generated by each emitter exclusively in the direction of the original beams of the at least one other emitter relative to its opposing detector; generating corrected projection data records by removing the calculated scattered radiation from the original projection data records; reconstruction of the object with the corrected projection data records, and implementing a further iteration of the method when determining the scattered radiation or issuing the reconstruction result if at least one predetermined abort criterion applies.