Cu-Si-Co Alloy Spring Limit via Multi-Stage Aging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cu-Si-Co-based copper alloys for electronic components face limitations in achieving superior spring limit, strength, and conductivity, despite advancements in precipitation-hardened copper alloys.

Innovation Solution

A Cu-Si-Co-based alloy with specific composition (0.5-2.5% Co, 0.1-0.7% Si, and controlled Ni, Cr, and other impurities, subjected to a multi-stage aging treatment under precise temperature and time conditions, enhancing the distribution of second-phase particles and crystal orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional solid solution-strengthened copper alloys (phosphor bronze, brass) are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but strength and electrical conductivity are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameters by transitioning from solid solution strengthening to precipitation hardening mechanism. This involves controlling the composition parameters (Co: 0.5-2.5 mass%, Si: 0.1-0.7 mass%) and heat treatment parameters (solution treatment at 850-1050°C followed by aging at 300-500°C) to achieve fine precipitate formation, thereby simultaneously improving strength and electrical conductivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure consisting of a copper matrix with dispersed fine precipitates of Co-Si-based intermetallic compounds. This composite structure at the micro-scale provides both high strength through precipitate reinforcement and high electrical conductivity through the continuous copper matrix, resolving the contradiction between strength and conductivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If Cu-Si-Co-based alloy with standard aging treatment is used, then production process is simpler, but spring limit is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring limitVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the aging process into multiple stages with different temperature and time parameters. The first aging stage (300-400°C for 1-24 hours) forms initial precipitates, while the second aging stage (400-500°C for 1-24 hours) coarsens and redistributes them. This segmented approach creates an optimized precipitate distribution that significantly improves spring limit compared to single-stage aging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs periodic heat treatment cycles consisting of solution treatment followed by two sequential aging treatments. This periodic thermal processing creates rhythmic precipitation and coarsening cycles that optimize the precipitate morphology and distribution, thereby enhancing spring limit while maintaining a systematic production process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Strength

If multi-stage aging treatment is applied to improve spring limit, then mechanical properties improve, but production time and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring limitVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the solution treatment and hot rolling operations into a combined high-temperature processing step performed at 850-1050°C. This merging eliminates separate heating and cooling cycles, reducing production time while maintaining the necessary microstructure for subsequent multi-stage aging treatment to achieve high spring limit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The alloy exhibits improved strength, conductivity, and spring limit, with a peak height ratio of diffraction peaks at least 2.5 times that of standard copper, achieving a balanced performance in mechanical and electrical properties.

Implementation Method 1

a supersaturated solid solution, which has been subjected to solution treatment, is subjected to ageing treatment, whereby fine precipitates are homogeneously dispersed and not only the strength but also the electrical conductivity of the alloy are increased

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation hardening: Precipitation Hardening

Implementation Method 2

step 5 of performing solution treatment at 950-1050°C, and then cooling the material temperature with an average cooling rate of at least 15°C/sec from 850°C to 400°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolution treatment:

Implementation Method 3

step 4 of aging treatment at 350-500°C for 1-24 hours; step 7 of ageing treatment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAging treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 4

step 2 of heating the ingot to 950-1050°C for at least one hour and thereafter subjecting it to hot rolling, setting the temperature at the time of completion of the hot rolling to at least 850°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot rolling:

Data Source

PatentEP2692878B1Cu-si-co-base copper alloy for electronic materials and method for producing same
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORP
  • EP2692878B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2692878B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2692878B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A Cu-Si-Co-based alloy having an enhanced spring limit is provided. The copper alloy comprises 0.5-2.5 mass% of Co, 0.1-0.7 mass% of Si, the balance Cu and inevitable impurities, wherein, from a result obtained from measurement of an X ray diffraction pole figure, using a rolled surface as a reference plane, a peak height at 6 angle of 90° among diffraction peaks in {111} Cu plane with respect to {200} Cu plane by 6 scanning at α=35° is at least 2.5 times that of a standard copper powder.