Cuboid Hoarding Block with Integrated Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional hoarding systems for construction sites, primarily made of timber and plywood, are not sustainable as they require cutting down trees and often end up in landfills after use, lacking a closed-loop recycling option and causing environmental harm.

Innovation Solution

A hoarding system utilizing steel and recyclable uPVC materials, featuring a cuboid block design with integrated channels for secure post fixation and a modular structure that allows for repeated reuse, eliminating the need for timber and plywood, and enabling easy disassembly and re-deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional timber and plywood hoarding is used, then the hoarding can be installed quickly and provides adequate barrier function, but it requires cutting down trees and causes environmental harm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidenvironmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters from natural timber/plywood to recycled uPVC and steel, transforming the environmental properties while maintaining the functional parameters of barrier strength and installation capability. The uPVC material provides equivalent protective function without the deforestation impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a closed-loop recycling system where hoarding panels are designed to be recovered and reused multiple times. The modular design allows for easy disassembly and relocation, maximizing material recovery and minimizing waste, directly addressing the environmental harm of single-use timber hoarding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Quantity of substance

If traditional timber and plywood hoarding is used, then the hoarding can be provided at low cost, but it is not sustainable and ends up in landfills after use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a continuous cycle of useful action through repeated reuse. The modular hoarding system is designed to be disassembled, relocated, and reinstalled multiple times across different construction sites, extending the material service life and eliminating the waste problem associated with single-use traditional hoarding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a recovery mechanism where hoarding panels are collected and reused rather than discarded. The standardized modular components facilitate efficient recovery and redistribution, creating an economic cycle that reduces material waste while maintaining affordability through reuse rather than continuous new material production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Stability of the object's composition

If in-ground hoarding with timber posts and concrete backfill is used, then the hoarding provides stable support, but it requires digging holes and using wet concrete which delays installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates pre-formed concrete blocks with integrated channels and mounting features that are prepared in advance. These pre-actioned components eliminate the need for on-site hole digging and wet concrete pouring, allowing for immediate installation while maintaining the structural stability provided by concrete-based support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the support system into discrete modular segments - individual concrete blocks with integrated channels rather than continuous in-ground construction. This segmentation allows for rapid assembly and disassembly without requiring permanent ground penetration or curing time, resolving the conflict between stability and installation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If steel and recyclable uPVC materials are used, then the hoarding system becomes sustainable and reusable, but the system complexity increases with integrated channels and modular components

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesustainabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into integrated components - the concrete blocks incorporate channels, mounting features, and structural support in a single unified element. This integration simplifies the overall system by reducing the number of separate parts and assembly steps, achieving sustainability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs universal modular components that can be used across different hoarding configurations and sites. The standardized channels and mounting features allow the same basic units to serve multiple purposes and locations, reducing the variety of components needed and simplifying the system despite the advanced materials and integrated features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4321712A1Block for supporting a hoarding system
Publication Date: 2024.02.14 PANTHERA GRP LTD
  • EP4321712A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4321712A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4321712A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A substantially cuboid block (1) for supporting a hoarding system comprises a body (2) having a length between a first set of two parallel planes at a front (3) and back (4) of the body, a width between a second set of two parallel planes defined at first and second sides (5,6), each plane of the second set being substantially perpendicular to the planes of the first set, a height being between a third set of two parallel planes defined at a top and bottom surfaces (7,8), each plane of the third set being substantially perpendicular to the planes of the first and second sets, the body having a substantially cuboid void (9), an edge of the void corresponding with an edge between the first side and the front of the body thereby providing an indented front surface (10) and an indented first side surface (22).