Cultural Data Quantification and Visualization Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack standardized methods for measuring, scoring, and visually representing cultural attributes and characteristics, leading to operational inefficiencies and missed revenue due to the absence of reliable analytics engines that can quantify and compare cultural data across different cultures and variables.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an analytic engine that collects and scores cultural attribute information using a binary score system, maps data to graphic outputs, and compares cultural tendencies using a comparison engine, enabling quantification and visualization of cultural characteristics and tendencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If cultural data is collected and analyzed using standardized methods, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and system requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecultural data measurement precisionVSAvoidanalytics engine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments cultural data analysis into distinct modules: data collection engine, scoring engine, mapping engine, and comparison engine. Each module handles specific tasks (collecting cultural attributes, scoring cultural tendencies, mapping to graphic outputs, comparing cultures), allowing complex cultural analysis to be broken down into manageable, standardized components that improve measurement precision without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms qualitative cultural data into quantitative parameters through standardized scoring mechanisms. Cultural attributes are converted into scored data with binary scores and cultural tendencies, enabling precise measurement and comparison while maintaining systematic organization through defined parameters and categories

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If comprehensive cultural data is collected and scored, then information completeness is improved, but loss of time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecultural information completenessVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary organization and categorization of cultural data as it is collected. Cultural attributes are pre-grouped into categories, and scoring frameworks are established in advance, allowing comprehensive cultural information to be captured and structured before analysis, reducing the time required for subsequent processing and comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates standardized graphic output representations of cultural data that serve as efficient copies or summaries of the comprehensive scored data. These visual mappings capture essential cultural characteristics in condensed form, allowing complete cultural information to be retained while enabling rapid comparison and analysis without processing entire raw datasets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10290010B2Methods for organizing, qualifying, scoring, mapping and analyzing cultural data
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 ROUNDHOUSE ONE LLC
  • US10290010B2 patent drawing
  • US10290010B2 patent drawing
  • US10290010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for quantification and mapping of cultural characteristics. Using an analytic engine, cultural attribute information is collected and organized by assigning binary scores to cultural tendencies. Using a cultural score engine coupled to the analytic engine, cultural attribute data is scored for each cultural attribute category to create scored data. Scored data is mapped to a graphic output using a map engine. Quantification of areas, organization priorities, or cultural tendencies associated with each graphic output is performed with an assessment engine. Comparing multiple cultures or scenarios affecting cultural attributes is executed by a comparison engine that compares multiple cultural graphic outputs in a single comparison graphic output of cultural tendencies.