CuO-Fe2O3 Oxygen Carrier for Hydrogen Production and CO2 Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing hydrogen and synthesis gas are energy-intensive and require additional steps for CO2 separation, which is not sequestration-ready, especially in processes like steam methane reforming and chemical looping combustion.

Innovation Solution

The use of a CuO-Fe2O3 oxygen carrier in chemical looping combustion for methane reduction and subsequent catalytic decomposition to produce pure hydrogen and carbon, with the reduced carrier also serving as a catalyst for steam reforming, generating heat and producing a sequestration-ready CO2 stream.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If steam methane reforming is used to produce hydrogen, then hydrogen production is achieved, but additional steps are required for CO2 separation and the process is energy-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen production efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the hydrogen production process with CO2 capture in a single integrated system. The chemical looping combustion process merges fuel conversion with oxygen transport and CO2 separation, eliminating the need for separate CO2 removal steps while maintaining high hydrogen production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The oxygen carrier serves multiple functions simultaneously: it transports oxygen from air to the fuel reactor, acts as a catalyst for methane conversion, and enables direct production of sequestration-ready CO2. This multi-functionality reduces overall process complexity while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of energy

If conventional combustion with air is used, then energy for CO2 separation is required, but replacing air with pure oxygen produces sequestration-ready CO2 without additional separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption for CO2 separationVSAvoidoxygen production complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The oxygen carrier acts as an intermediary that transports oxygen from air to the fuel without requiring direct contact between fuel and air. This mediator enables the system to use ambient air while achieving the benefits of pure oxygen combustion, producing sequestration-ready CO2 without energy-intensive separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The oxygen carrier automatically cycles between oxidized and reduced states, transporting oxygen where needed and regenerating in the air reactor. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external oxygen production infrastructure, reducing both energy consumption and manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If chemical looping combustion is used to produce sequestration-ready CO2, then CO2 separation energy is eliminated, but the process requires novel oxygen carrier materials and process configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy for CO2 separationVSAvoidprocess configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The oxygen carrier performs multiple functions: oxygen transport, catalysis of methane conversion, and enabling direct CO2 production. This multi-functionality justifies the novel process configuration by eliminating energy-intensive CO2 separation while maintaining overall process efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The use of composite oxygen carrier materials with specific properties (mixed metal oxides, core-shell structures) enables the novel chemical looping process to achieve both sequestration-ready CO2 production and high hydrogen yields, making the complex process configuration worthwhile

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Productivity

If traditional catalysts like nickel or noble metals are used for methane decomposition, then high catalytic activity is achieved, but environmental and cost concerns arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses abundant, non-toxic metal oxides (copper, iron, zinc) as catalysts instead of expensive noble metals or environmentally problematic nickel. These materials are cheaper, environmentally benign, and can be readily replaced or regenerated, eliminating the harmful effects associated with traditional catalysts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process reduces energy consumption, eliminates the need for additional gas processing, and produces a sequestration-ready CO2 stream while achieving high hydrogen and synthesis gas yields, with the CuO-Fe2O3 catalyst being environmentally benign and cost-effective compared to traditional nickel or noble metal catalysts.

Implementation Method 1

Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is a novel combustion technology that utilizes an oxygen carrier, such as metal oxide, to transport oxygen from air to fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical looping combustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

The overall CLC process, in which the metal oxide cycles between oxidized and reduced states, is exothermic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

initial reduction of the oxygen carrier with fuel, such as methane or synthesis gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 4

A recent systems analysis indicated that the cost of hydrogen production by thermal decomposition of methane is lower than the cost for the steam reforming process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 5

Thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane to carbon and hydrogen has received attention because the process produces hydrogen directly without any additional gas processing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 6

Steam methane reforming (SMR) is currently the most popular commercial method of producing hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam reforming: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 7

The reduced CuO—Fe2O3 carrier is used for the catalytic decomposition process to produce hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS10513436B1Production of pure hydrogen and synthesis gas or carbon with CUO-Fe2O3 oxygen carriers using chemical looping combustion and methane decomposition/reforming
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
  • US10513436B1 patent drawing
  • US10513436B1 patent drawing
  • US10513436B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and apparatus relate to producing synthesis gas or carbon and hydrogen utilizing a reduced catalyst CuO—Fe2O3. The method comprises introducing CH4; reducing the CuO—Fe2O3 with the introduced CH4, yielding at least a reduced metal catalyst; oxidizing the reduced metal with O2 yielding CuO—Fe2O3; and generating heat that would be used for the hydrogen and carbon or syngas production with the reduced catalyst CuO—Fe2O3.