CuO Inverse Opal Electrocatalyst for Selective CO2 Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electrochemical CO2 reduction technologies face challenges with slow kinetics, poor product selectivity, and competitive hydrogen evolution due to the dependence on precious metals and limited understanding of electrochemically active sites in copper-based catalysts, particularly in inverse opal structures.

Innovation Solution

Development of hierarchical CuO-derived inverse opal (CuO-IO) electrocatalyst compositions with a three-dimensional interconnected structure, synthesized using a poly(methyl methacrylate) latex opal template, featuring copper-oxide nanoparticles with specific diameter and cavity sizes, which enhance CO2 conversion rates and selectivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional electrochemical CO2 reduction methods are used, then CO2 can be converted to chemicals and fuels, but the process suffers from slow kinetics and requires significant overpotentials

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 conversion rateVSAvoidoverpotential
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the oxidation state parameter of copper catalysts from metallic Cu(0) to Cu(I) and Cu(II) oxide states. This parameter change fundamentally alters the electrochemical behavior, enabling CO2 reduction at lower overpotentials while maintaining high productivity. The Cu(I) and Cu(II) oxide catalysts achieve comparable or superior CO2 conversion rates to conventional catalysts but at significantly reduced energy overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional copper catalysts are used, then CO2 conversion can be achieved, but product selectivity is poor and hydrogen evolution competes strongly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct selectivityVSAvoidhydrogen evolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific surface sites with defined oxidation states (Cu(I) and Cu(II)) on the catalyst surface. These localized active sites with specific electronic structures preferentially bind and activate CO2 molecules, directing the reaction toward desired carbonaceous products while suppressing the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. The local electronic environment at these oxide sites is fundamentally different from metallic copper surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the oxidation state parameter from Cu(0) to Cu(I)/Cu(II) oxides, the patent fundamentally alters the surface chemistry and reaction pathways. This parameter change shifts the product distribution toward higher selectivity for CO, formate, and other C1 products while dramatically reducing hydrogen evolution, solving the selectivity problem inherent in conventional copper catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If copper catalysts with various structures are used, then product selectivity can be improved, but the nature of electrochemically active sites remains difficult to understand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct selectivityVSAvoidunderstanding of active sites
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates the oxidation state as the critical variable by systematically studying Cu(I) and Cu(II) oxide catalysts separately from metallic copper and other copper phases. This extraction of the oxidation state parameter allows for clear structure-activity relationships to be established, revealing that Cu(I) and Cu(II) oxide sites are the true active species responsible for selective CO2 reduction, thereby recovering the lost understanding of active site nature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The CuO-IO electrocatalysts demonstrate a 3-10-fold enhancement in CO2 conversion selectivity and efficiency, achieving high Faradaic efficiencies and current densities with improved CO production, while suppressing hydrogen evolution, thus overcoming the limitations of existing copper-based catalysts.

Implementation Method 1

Electrochemical CO2 reduction (EC-CO2RR) is a promising approach to convert CO2 emissions into industrially-relevant and value-added chemicals and fuels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reduction: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

The three-dimensional (3D) interconnected, highly porous structure of IOs are arranged in hexagonal close packed framework and offer large surface-to-volume ratio and better adsorbability of reactant molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS20230313393A1Selective CO2 Conversion with Novel Copper Catalyst
Publication Date: 2023.10.05 THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
  • US20230313393A1 patent drawing
  • US20230313393A1 patent drawing
  • US20230313393A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides hierarchical CuO-derived inverse opal (CuO—IO) electrocatalyst compositions, their synthesis, and their application to selectively convert CO2 into carbon monoxide (CO). The electrocatalyst compositions have a three-dimensional interconnected CuO backbone in hexagonal arrangement. In one embodiment, the compositions have an inverse structure of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) latex opal. In one embodiment, the electrocatalyst composition inverse-opal structure is comprised of copper-oxide nanoparticles having an average mean diameter ranging from about 15 to about 20 nm. In another embodiment, the compositions have an average cavity size of 175 to 185 nm.