Vehicle Cup Holder Support Member for Stable Multi-Size Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cup holders in vehicles often fail to securely stabilize cups or bottles of varying sizes, especially during vehicle maneuvers, due to inadequate support mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates resiliently deformable support members with a convex lower portion and a concave or convex upper portion, providing improved retention and stability by allowing for flexible accommodation of different container sizes and shapes, and securing them effectively within the holder.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cup holder designs are used, then the structure is simple, but the retention and stability of cups or bottles of varying sizes is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention and stabilityVSAvoidsupport member structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support member is divided into multiple distinct portions: a lower portion with a convex surface and an upper portion with a concave surface. This segmentation allows each portion to perform a specific function - the lower convex portion provides initial contact and support, while the upper concave portion provides enhanced retention for the cup or bottle, thereby improving overall stability without requiring multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the support member are given different geometric qualities - the lower portion has a convex surface while the upper portion has a concave surface. This local variation in geometry allows the support member to adapt to different container sizes and shapes at different locations, improving retention reliability while maintaining a single integrated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If spring biased fingers are used, then retention of varying sizes is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of varying sizesVSAvoidsupport mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support member is designed to be resiliently deformable, allowing it to dynamically adapt to different cup or bottle sizes and shapes. This dynamic capability enables the single support member to accommodate varying dimensions without requiring multiple adjustable components or spring mechanisms, maintaining structural simplicity while achieving versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support member's physical parameters (shape, curvature) are optimized with specific geometric features - a lower convex portion and an upper concave portion with different radii of curvature. These parameter changes allow the support member to effectively retain containers of varying sizes through its deformable nature, eliminating the need for spring biased mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a one piece mold design with resilient support members is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but the stability during vehicle maneuvers is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveone piece mold designVSAvoidstability during maneuvers
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Within the one-piece molded structure, the support member is segmented into functionally distinct portions - a lower convex portion and an upper concave portion. This internal segmentation provides enhanced stability during vehicle maneuvers by creating multiple contact points and retention zones, while the entire support member remains integrally formed for manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support member incorporates curved surfaces with different radii of curvature - a convex lower portion and a concave upper portion. These curved geometries provide superior contact and retention for cylindrical containers during acceleration, deceleration, and cornering, enhancing stability while maintaining the simplicity of injection molding manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the retention and stability of articles, such as cups or bottles, in vehicle interiors, ensuring they remain secure during vehicle operations, including high-speed cornering, thus creating a safer environment for occupants.

Implementation Method 1

The support member is resiliently deformable and has a convex lower portion and a concave upper portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7413154B2Vehicle cup holder with improved support member
Publication Date: 2008.08.19 INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS GROUP NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US7413154B2 patent drawing
  • US7413154B2 patent drawing
  • US7413154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A holder for receiving and supporting an article includes a sidewall defining a cavity for receiving the article. At least one resiliently deformable support member is attached to the sidewall. The support member has a surface inwardly extending into said cavity. The surface is operable to support the article. The support member includes an upper portion and a lower portion. The lower portion defines a convex surface and the upper surface defines one of a concave surface and a convex surface having a larger radius of curvature than the lower portion.