Visualizing Polymerization Stress in Curable Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a standard and effective way to measure polymerization stress in curable materials, which is crucial for understanding its impact on tooth restorations, as existing techniques are either inaccurate or not suitable for all types of materials, and there is no clear correlation between polymerization shrinkage and stress in clinical studies.

Innovation Solution

A simple test method and apparatus using frosted glass slides and a steel spacer to distinguish between high and low contraction stress materials by observing crack formation in a thin glass cover slip during curing, allowing for the visualization of curing stress impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional measurement methods (Archimedes' method, water dilatometer, etc.) are used to measure polymerization shrinkage, then measurement can be performed, but the methods are either inaccurate, rough, or not suitable for all material types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymerization shrinkage measurement accuracyVSAvoidsuitability for different material types
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a thin glass cover slip as an intermediary medium to indirectly measure polymerization stress. The cover slip acts as a sensor that translates internal stress into visible crack patterns, allowing measurement without direct contact with the curable material and avoiding contamination issues with water or gas-based methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems (LVDT, strain gauges, micrometers) with a simple visual observation method. Instead of using sophisticated instruments to detect dimensional changes, the system uses crack formation in the glass cover slip as a direct visual indicator of stress levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If sophisticated measurement apparatus (water dilatometer with LVDT, CCD system) are used, then accurate shrinkage kinetics can be measured, but the device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshrinkage kinetics measurement accuracyVSAvoidapparatus structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses inexpensive glass cover slips (standard laboratory equipment) instead of expensive, complex measurement devices. The cover slips are disposable - once they crack from stress, they are discarded and replaced with new ones, eliminating the need for expensive instrumentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed (stress level indication) from the complex polymerization process. Instead of measuring all parameters (dimensional change, volume shrinkage, kinetics), the system focuses solely on stress visualization through crack patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Loss of information

If direct stress measurement methods are used, then stress data can be obtained, but the methods lack a clear correlation with clinical restoration longevity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrelation between stress and clinical outcomeVSAvoidclinical study validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses visual changes (crack formation and patterns in glass) as indicators of stress levels. This visual manifestation creates a direct, observable correlation between measurement results and material performance, making it easier to understand the relationship between polymerization stress and restoration longevity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively differentiates between high and low contraction stress materials by observing crack formation in the cover slip, providing a visual and economic means to assess potential impacts on bonded substitutes, thus aiding in material ranking and understanding curing stress effects.

Implementation Method 1

The origin of stress from a composite in adhesive restorations is attributed to the restrained shrinkage, which is a direct result of a curing or polymerization process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization shrinkage: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

measuring indirectly by the density change... the difference is calculated to generate the total volume shrinkage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentEP2638357B1Use of an apparatus for visualizing contraction stress from curable materials
Publication Date: 2019.12.25 DENTSPLY SIRONA INC
  • EP2638357B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2638357B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4c
  • EP2638357B1 patent drawingFigure 5a~5c

AI summary

Disclosed herein is an apparatus and a method to use such an apparatus for visualizing the contraction stress from curable materials. Particularly, a simple test device has been designed and fabricated and a method of using such a device, which allows a user to easily distinguish the curable materials that can generate contraction stress in different magnitudes. More specifically, the present disclosure provides a simple and effective way to make the complicated contraction stress due to polymerization (curing or setting) visualizable and audible.