Curl Reduction Device for Inkjet Printers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inkjet recording apparatuses face inefficiencies in throughput due to the need for a waiting time to reduce curl in recording media, leading to increased time required to complete the discharge of multiple images, as each medium must wait until curl is minimized before being stacked, which can result in folding or bending if discharged prematurely.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejection apparatus with a curl reduction device that uses a combination of controlled waiting time and heated air to reduce curl, where the waiting time and heating parameters are adjusted based on the position in the print job and paper characteristics, allowing for differential curl reduction among media to optimize stacking and reduce overall throughput time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a waiting time is applied to reduce curl before discharging recording media, then the curl amount is reduced and media quality is improved, but the throughput time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurl amountVSAvoidthroughput time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying the waiting time duration based on the discharge sequence position. Earlier-discharged media receive longer waiting times while later-discharged media receive shorter waiting times, optimizing both curl reduction and throughput efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the waiting time for each recording medium based on its position in the discharge sequence. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize curl reduction for each medium individually while maintaining overall throughput efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the waiting time is reduced to improve throughput, then the productivity increases, but the curl amount becomes larger causing folding or bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput timeVSAvoidcurl amount
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the waiting time parameter according to the discharge sequence position, allowing shorter waiting times for later media to improve throughput while still achieving sufficient curl reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial waiting time to later-discharged media, providing just enough time to reduce curl to an acceptable level rather than applying a uniform maximum waiting time to all media

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces curl in recording media, enabling them to be discharged sooner without folding or bending, thereby improving the throughput efficiency of the inkjet recording apparatus by allowing for staggered discharge and optimized stacking.

Implementation Method 1

a curl reduction device configured to reduce curl caused in each of the recording media

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9039161B2Liquid ejection apparatus including curl reduction device, curl reduction method executed in the apparatus, and storage medium used for the apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.05.26 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US9039161B2 patent drawing
  • US9039161B2 patent drawing
  • US9039161B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejection apparatus includes: (a) a storage device for storing an image data set representing a plurality of images; (b) a liquid ejection head for performing an image formation on each recording medium; (c) a curl reduction device for reducing curl caused in each recording medium having the corresponding image formed thereon by the liquid ejection head; (d) an output tray for receiving each recording medium whose curl has been reduced by the curl reduction device, such that the received recording media are stacked on the output tray; and (e) a control device configured to control the curl reduction device, such that the curl caused in an earlier one of the recording media is reduced by a smaller degree than the curl caused in a later one of the recording media that has been subjected to the image formation later than the earlier one of the recording media.