Current Comparator Accuracy via Bipolar Core Saturation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current current comparator systems face challenges in achieving parts per billion accuracy due to factors like interruptions during measurements and manufacturing variations in toroids, leading to residual flux and offsets.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a current comparator design with a bi-polar current profile to saturate and null the magnetic field within the magnetic core, using a digital to analog converter, current tracking amplifiers, and load resistors to iteratively cycle the current through negative and positive cycles, effectively addressing residual flux and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional current comparator systems are used, then measurement capability is provided, but residual flux and offsets prevent parts per billion accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidresidual flux
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a degaussing sequence that saturates the magnetic core in both positive and negative directions before measurements are taken. This preliminary saturation process eliminates residual flux and hysteresis effects that would otherwise compromise measurement accuracy at parts per billion levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through iterative cycling of bi-polar current through the magnetic core. By repeatedly saturating the core in alternating positive and negative directions, the system progressively reduces residual flux to negligible levels, enabling high-precision measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Ease of operation

If measurement cycles are interrupted, then operational flexibility is improved, but residual flux generates offsets reducing accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary degaussing cycles after interruptions to restore the magnetic core to a flux-free state before resuming measurements. This ensures that operational flexibility does not compromise measurement accuracy by eliminating residual flux generated during interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms that monitor measurement conditions and automatically initiate degaussing sequences when interruptions are detected. This feedback control ensures the magnetic core is properly conditioned before measurements resume, maintaining parts per billion accuracy despite operational interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If manufacturing variations in toroids occur, then device complexity is reduced, but residual flux increases causing offsets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing toleranceVSAvoidresidual flux
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of manufacturing variations that cause residual flux into a beneficial process by implementing controlled saturation cycles. These cycles deliberately drive the magnetic core to saturation in both directions, systematically eliminating residual flux from whatever source, thereby transforming manufacturing imperfections into manageable conditions that enable high-precision measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of current comparator systems to parts per billion by effectively nullifying magnetic field offsets and improving measurement precision.

Implementation Method 1

generating a first predetermined current profile to initially saturate a magnetic core of the current comparator and subsequently iteratively cycle the current through negative and positive cycles to null the magnetic field within the magnetic core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic saturation: Magnetic Saturation

Implementation Method 2

null the magnetic field within the magnetic core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

selectively coupling the first winding of the current comparator to ground via the load resistor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10151777B2Methods and systems for accuracy improvement in current comparators
Publication Date: 2018.12.11 GUILDLINE INSTRUMENTS LTD
  • US10151777B2 patent drawing
  • US10151777B2 patent drawing
  • US10151777B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Precision AC and DC voltage, current, phase, power and energy measurements and calibrations with current ranges from 1 uA to 20 kA and voltage ranges from 1V to 1000 kV are now performed with accuracies of better than one part per million. Continued demand for improved accuracy has led the inventors to address remnant magetization within the current comparators that form the basis of the measuring process within many of the measurement instruments providing the precision AC and DC measurements and calibrations. Accordingly, the inventors present current comparator and measurement system architectures together with control protocols to provide for correction of this remnant magnetization.