Current Density Mapping in 2D Material Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for characterizing 2D electrically conductive materials, such as graphene or TMDCs, fail to measure current density distribution effectively due to their sensitivity to defects and ambient conditions, primarily focusing on macroscopic properties rather than localized current density at grain boundaries or impurities.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the placement of current measurement probes at multiple positions near the interfaces between 2D conductive material and electrodes, coupled to the same voltage as the electrodes, to determine boundary conditions for current density, followed by solving the continuity equation ∇·J=0 to obtain the current density distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional electrical characterization methods are used to measure macroscopic properties, then the total current flowing between electrodes can be determined, but the magnitude and direction of current density at a point of interest in the 2D material cannot be measured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent density measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement approach segments the continuous current flow into discrete measurable components by placing probes at specific locations along the electrode-2D material interface. The interface is divided into multiple measurement points where local current density can be independently characterized, transforming an unresolvable macroscopic measurement into a series of localized measurements that can be integrated to obtain the complete current density distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Conductive probes serve as intermediary elements between the electrodes and the measurement instrumentation. These probes make localized contact with the 2D material at the interface, enabling current extraction at specific positions without disrupting the overall device operation. The probes act as mediators that transfer local current information to the measurement system while maintaining the electrical continuity of the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If measurement probes are placed at the interface between 2D material and electrodes, then localized current density can be measured, but the boundary conditions for current density distribution must be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent density distribution informationVSAvoidboundary condition determination difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The methodology performs preliminary measurements along the entire electrode-2D material interface before solving for the internal current density distribution. By first characterizing the boundary current density at all interface locations, the necessary boundary conditions are established in advance, enabling subsequent calculation of the current density throughout the 2D material bulk using the continuity equation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The solution process incorporates feedback by using the measured boundary current densities to validate and refine the calculated internal current density distribution. The continuity equation solution is constrained by and continuously referenced to the experimentally determined boundary conditions, ensuring that the final current density map accurately reflects both the measured interface behavior and the physical constraints of current conservation within the material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise determination of current density distribution within 2D materials, providing detailed insights into electron conduction and transport properties, overcoming the limitations of conventional characterization methods by measuring localized current density.

Implementation Method 1

The probe is coupled to the same voltage as the first electrode, thereby locally shunting the current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

the continuity equation ∇·J=0 is solved, taking into account the boundary conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurrent Conservation:

Data Source

PatentUS11754603B2Method for determining the spatial distribution of electrical current density in a two-dimensional material device
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO ELECTRONICS CENT (IMEC VZW)
  • US11754603B2 patent drawing
  • US11754603B2 patent drawing
  • US11754603B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The current density distribution is determined in an electronic device including a first and a second electrode, and a layer of a 2-dimensional conductive material extending between the first and second electrode. The total current through the electrodes is measured, and then a first current measurement probe is placed at a plurality of positions near the interface between the 2D material and the first electrode. The probe is coupled to the same voltage as the first electrode. The same is done at the interface between the channel and the second electrode, by placing a second probe coupled to the same voltage as the second electrode. The boundary conditions are determined for the current, and assuming that the current density vector is normal to the interfaces, this yields the boundary conditions for the current density vector. Finally, the continuity equation is solved, taking into account the boundary conditions.