Current-Controlled Level Shifter With Feedback-Tuned Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current controlled level shifters experience delays in output signal changes due to parasitic capacitances, which are exacerbated by higher control current amplitudes, leading to increased power loss.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a feedback path with a second shifter stage that adjusts control current amplitudes after input signal changes, allowing increased current flow only during short periods post-change, thereby reducing switching delay without significantly increasing power loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the amplitude of control currents is increased to reduce switching delay, then the delay time decreases, but the power loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching delayVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by using refresh pulses that are generated at regular intervals to periodically update the control currents. This allows the system to maintain the output signal state without requiring continuous high current flow, thereby reducing power loss while still achieving fast switching when needed. The refresh pulses are timed to coincide with the natural discharge cycles of the parasitic capacitances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the amplitude of control currents based on the operational state. During switching transitions, higher current amplitudes are applied to overcome parasitic capacitance effects and reduce delay. During stable states, the current amplitude is reduced to minimize power consumption. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between switching speed and power loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the amplitude of control currents is increased to reduce switching delay, then the delay time decreases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching delayVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by monitoring the state of parasitic capacitances and automatically adjusting the control current amplitude accordingly. The feedback mechanism detects when capacitance charging/discharging is complete and modulates the current to maintain optimal switching performance without requiring complex external control circuitry. This feedback-based approach reduces switching delay while keeping the overall device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by designing the circuit to automatically manage its own switching transitions using the inherent properties of the parasitic capacitances. The circuit leverages the natural charge-discharge cycles of the capacitances to time the application of control currents, eliminating the need for external timing circuits or complex control logic. This self-managing approach reduces switching delay without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7511553B2Current controlled level shifter with signal feedback
Publication Date: 2009.03.31 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US7511553B2 patent drawing
  • US7511553B2 patent drawing
  • US7511553B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a current controlled level shifter which has an input stage having an input for supplying an input signal and having first and second outputs for providing a first and a second control current. A first shifter stage is connected to the outputs of the input stage and is designed to produce an output signal which is dependent on the first and second control currents. A feedback path is designed to provide at least one feedback signal which is dependent on the output signal and to supply it to the input stage. The input stage is designed to compare the input signal with the at least one feedback signal and to set the amplitudes of the control currents on the basis of this comparison.