Current Sensor Error Compensation via Virtual Current and Disturbance Observer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current control devices face challenges in accurately suppressing periodic disturbances caused by offset and gain errors in current sensors, which lead to oscillations and noise, particularly in motor systems, as existing methods require external torque sensors and increase calculation loads.

Innovation Solution

A control device is designed to correct gain and offset errors in current sensors by generating a voltage command, calculating a virtual current value, and using a periodic disturbance observer to estimate and compensate for errors, thereby reducing periodic disturbances without the need for external sensors and minimizing calculation loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a periodic disturbance observer is used to suppress torque ripple, then suppression effect is improved, but calculation load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuppression effectVSAvoidcalculation load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary components for disturbance observation by using a simplified plant model that excludes certain terms (e.g., setting Ldq = 0). This extraction approach maintains the essential disturbance suppression capability while removing unnecessary calculation elements, thereby reducing computational load while preserving the suppression effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the plant model by simplifying the mathematical expressions and reducing the order of the model. By modifying the model parameters to be less computationally intensive while retaining the core functionality of disturbance observation, the calculation load is reduced without significantly compromising the suppression performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If system identification is performed for accurate model acquisition, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoididentification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs system identification in advance during the design phase to obtain the plant model parameters. By completing the time-consuming identification process beforehand, the accurate model is stored and reused during actual operation, thereby achieving high measurement precision without incurring time delays during real-time control execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent prepares the plant model parameters through prior system identification and stores them for future use. This beforehand preparation cushions against the time loss that would otherwise occur during real-time operations, allowing the system to maintain high accuracy without repeated identification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Measurement precision

If external torque sensors are used for disturbance measurement, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisturbance measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to self-measure disturbances using its own internal sensors and a simplified plant model, eliminating the need for external torque sensors. The system serves itself by observing disturbances through electrical measurements and model-based estimation, thereby maintaining measurement precision while reducing device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a simplified plant model as an intermediary that bridges the gap between available electrical measurements and disturbance estimation. This mathematical model acts as a mediator that allows accurate disturbance measurement without requiring direct mechanical sensing, thereby avoiding the complexity of external torque sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9973128B2Control device
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 MEIDENSHA CORP
  • US9973128B2 patent drawing
  • US9973128B2 patent drawing
  • US9973128B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Periodic disturbance occurs in current etc. due to offset error and gain error of a current sensor used in a control device. A voltage command value is generated from a current command value and a current detection value by the current sensor in a current control section. The generated voltage command value is inputted to a plant model section, and a virtual current value is calculated. The virtual current value is inputted to a periodic disturbance observer via a coordinate transform section, and a compensation value is calculated. The compensation value is superimposed on the current detection value via a coordinate inverse-transform section, and the current detection value of the current sensor is corrected.