Curriculum-Aligned FITB Question Generation for Precise Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional educational assessments, such as multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and open-ended questions, fail to precisely evaluate a learner's understanding of specific details within educational standards, leading to superficial learning and assessment inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A method and system integrating programmatic control and guided/constrained Artificial Intelligence (AI) to generate fill-in-the-blank (FITB) questions aligned with educational curriculum, utilizing an educational standards database, historical database, and natural language processing (NLP) to create highly specific questions with corresponding answers and learning content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If open-ended questions are used to assess student understanding, then detailed knowledge evaluation is possible, but the assessment time and grading complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment precisionVSAvoidgrading time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the assessment into structured components: a stem containing the question, a blank to be filled, and a predetermined answer key. This segmentation transforms open-ended questions into standardized fill-in-the-blank items that maintain assessment precision while enabling automated grading, thus reducing grading time without sacrificing measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If multiple-choice questions are used for assessment, then grading efficiency is improved, but students may guess answers without true understanding reducing assessment accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrading efficiencyVSAvoidassessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the answer selection mechanism from multiple-choice questions and replaces it with a fill-in-the-blank format where students must generate or select from predetermined answers. This extraction eliminates the guessing element inherent in MCQs while maintaining automated grading efficiency, as the system can still automatically compare student responses against the predetermined answer key.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If generic questions are used to test general understanding, then assessment coverage is broad, but specific learning objectives are not precisely evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment coverageVSAvoidlearning objective assessment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing questions with specific contextual clues embedded in the stem that point to particular learning objectives. Each fill-in-the-blank question is crafted to test a specific concept or fact while maintaining broad curriculum coverage, allowing precise evaluation of specific learning objectives without sacrificing overall assessment versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If AI-generated questions are used to increase assessment specificity, then learning objective alignment is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning objective alignmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by using AI to automatically generate fill-in-the-blank questions with predetermined answers based on curriculum standards and learning objectives. The system serves itself by autonomously creating assessment items without requiring manual question writing, thus improving learning objective alignment while the automated generation process manages the complexity through algorithmic rather than manual means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260073805A1Fill-in-the-blank question generation system aligned with educational curriculum for a user using integrated programmatic control and specialized guided and constrained artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 2HR LEARNING INC
  • US20260073805A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073805A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073805A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fill-in-the-blank generation system and method integrates programmatic control and a guided and constrained AI engine to generate a fill-in-the-blank (FITB) question aligned with the educational curriculum of the user. The study mode delivery system accesses the data from the educational standards database and historical database. The study mode delivery system receives a standard description and set of key terms from the data accessed from the databases. The analyzer integrated within the study mode delivery system analyzes the course, standard description, and key terms relevant to the educational curriculum and standards.