Curriculum Pathway Analysis for Educational Program Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods struggle to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of educational programs, particularly in continuing medical education, and lack a methodology to evaluate individual learner pathways through multiple activities within a curriculum.

Innovation Solution

A curriculum progression pathway analysis is implemented, which involves receiving baseline and post-activity performance scores, organizing learners by completed tracks, calculating average scores, and identifying statistical differences using paired sample t-tests, with a report generated to describe these differences and inferences, compatible with Moore's outcomes framework for CME programs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional assessment methods are used to evaluate educational programs, then the assessment process is simple, but the measurement precision and ability to quantitatively assess program impact are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment precisionVSAvoidmethodology complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the educational program into multiple learner tracks and activities, with each track representing a distinct learning pathway. This segmentation enables precise measurement of progress along specific pathways while maintaining organizational structure through defined activities and performance indices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of assessment by organizing learners into groups based on track completion and calculating baseline versus post-activity average scores. This dimensional approach transforms qualitative program evaluation into quantitative statistical analysis, enabling precise measurement of program impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple learner tracks are implemented in the educational program, then the program versatility and adaptability improve, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring individual pathway progress increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram versatilityVSAvoidpathway measurement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses performance index tests as intermediary measurement tools that translate complex multi-track learner progress into quantifiable baseline and post-activity scores. These intermediaries enable statistical comparison across different learner groups and tracks, making individual pathway progress detectable and measurable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

By organizing learners into groups based on track completion and introducing statistical analysis dimensions (baseline vs. post-activity, different learner groups), the patent transforms the complexity of multiple tracks into structured, measurable data that reveals progress patterns across diverse learning pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive statistical analysis is performed on learner performance data, then the measurement precision and insight quality improve, but the loss of time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical analysis precisionVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary organization of learners into groups based on track completion before conducting statistical analysis. This preliminary structuring of data reduces the complexity of subsequent statistical computations and enables more efficient processing of performance index scores across multiple learner cohorts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8666300B2Educational program assessment using curriculum progression pathway analysis
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 REALCME
  • US8666300B2 patent drawing
  • US8666300B2 patent drawing
  • US8666300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A curriculum progression pathway analysis assesses an educational program having multiple activities defining multiple learner tracks by organizing the learners into groups based on the learner tracks and, for each learner group, calculating a baseline average score, a post-activity average score, and statistical differences between the baseline average score and the post-activity average scores. Any significant statistical differences are identified, and a report may be generated describing statistical conclusions and inferences. The invention can further provide a domain-based learner analysis for curriculum, a domain-based learner analysis for activities, and a learner retention analysis. In an application for continuing medical education the performance index test includes a clinical vignette, a set of statements which are moved to either a best practices column or a not best practices column, and an indicator for an allowable number of moves to achieve a perfect score.