Curriculum Sequence Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Vehicle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in navigating complex urban environments due to the abundance of external factors and unpredictable changes, making it difficult to design reliable planning algorithms for safe decision-making, especially at intersections, as prior distance-based algorithms require laborious tuning and are not easily adaptable to various scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an automatically generated curriculum sequence based reinforcement learning method, which trains a vehicle control system to perform tasks in order of difficulty, using a processor to determine tasks and generate an action policy to maximize rewards, allowing the vehicle to learn and adapt to environmental changes without losing crucial details in computation complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If distance-based algorithms are used for intersection traversing, then navigation decisions can be made, but extensive tuning and rule design are required which increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of algorithm adaptationVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning agent autonomously learns optimal navigation policies through self-interaction with the environment, eliminating the need for manual tuning of distance-based parameters and rule design. The system serves itself by automatically adapting to various intersection scenarios through trial-and-error learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from fixed distance-based parameters requiring manual tuning to learned policies that dynamically adjust behavior based on environmental feedback. The reinforcement learning framework changes the approach from static parameter setting to adaptive parameter optimization through training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If all available perception data is used for decision making, then situation awareness is improved, but computation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituation awarenessVSAvoidcomputation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant features from the full perception data through the reinforcement learning training process. The agent learns to focus on critical information for navigation decisions, effectively filtering out redundant data and reducing computation complexity while maintaining situation awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex perception data is segmented into meaningful features that the reinforcement learning agent can process efficiently. The training process divides the overwhelming amount of sensor data into relevant components for decision-making, reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10732639B2Method and apparatus for automatically generated curriculum sequence based reinforcement learning for autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10732639B2 patent drawing
  • US10732639B2 patent drawing
  • US10732639B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application generally relates to a method and apparatus for generating an action policy for controlling an autonomous vehicle. In particular, the system performs a deep learning algorithm in order to determine the action policy and an automatically generated curriculum system to determine a number of increasingly difficult tasks in order to refine the action policy.