Curved Cutting Insert Geometry for Involute Gear Tooth Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and complexity of forming cutting edges with an involute curve shape in cutting inserts for gear cutting, requiring sophisticated techniques and long manufacturing times, necessitate a more efficient and cost-effective solution for forming tooth spaces.

Innovation Solution

A cutting insert with a cutting edge that follows a first curved shape with a constant curvature radius when viewed from the end surface and a second curved shape with a different curvature radius when viewed from the side surface, allowing for a shape highly similar to an involute curve, and an indexable rotary cutting tool with detachable inserts that utilize a sloped seating surface for secure mounting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the cutting edge is formed into a precise involute curve shape, then the gear tooth space accuracy is improved, but the manufacturing cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting edge accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge is formed with a specific curvature radius R1 when viewed from the end surface, creating a convex or concave curved shape. This spherical/curved geometry approximation achieves sufficient gear tooth accuracy without requiring complex involute curve formation processes, thereby reducing manufacturing difficulty while maintaining functional precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Ease of manufacture

If the cutting edge follows a simple curved shape, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the similarity to involute curve decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidinvolute curve similarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge geometry is defined by combining curvature in two different dimensions: a first curvature radius R1 when viewed from the end surface (one dimension) and a second curvature radius R2 when viewed from the side surface (another dimension). This multi-dimensional curvature combination creates a three-dimensional shape that approximates the involute curve more effectively than simple two-dimensional curves, achieving both manufacturing simplicity and geometric accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

By adjusting the parameters of the two curvature radii (R1 and R2) independently, the cutting edge geometry can be optimized to achieve high similarity to the involute curve. The specific values and relationships between R1 and R2 are tuned to minimize the difference from the ideal involute profile, thereby improving manufacturing precision while maintaining the simplicity of the curved shape formation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the cutting edge has different curvature radii in different viewing directions, then the three-dimensional shape accuracy is improved, but the manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-dimensional shape accuracyVSAvoidcurvature control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex three-dimensional cutting edge geometry is segmented into two independent curvature components: one curvature (R1) controlled when viewed from the end surface, and another curvature (R2) controlled when viewed from the side surface. This segmentation allows each curvature to be formed and controlled separately through simpler manufacturing operations, reducing the overall process complexity while achieving accurate three-dimensional shape through the combination of the two curved surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2939780B1Cutting insert and rotary cutting tool with replaceable blade edge
Publication Date: 2021.06.16 TUNGALOY CORP
  • EP2939780B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2939780B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2939780B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

The present invention provides a cutting insert (1) including a cutting edge having an involute-curve approximate shape. A cutting edge (18) is formed so as to wholly take on a first curved shape with a first curvature radius when the cutting insert is viewed from the end surface, and is formed so that a large part of the cutting edge (18) takes on a second curved shape with a second curvature radius when the cutting insert is viewed from the side surface.