Curved Ion Beam Deceleration Stage for Energy Contamination Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ion implanters face energy contamination issues due to energetic neutrals that are not properly decelerated and strike the substrate at higher energies than intended, especially when using straight deceleration stages, leading to inefficiencies in low-energy high-current ion beam transport and potential damage to substrates.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a deceleration stage with a deflection assembly and a hydrogen source to create a partial pressure of hydrogen gas, which deflects and decelerates the ion beam, reducing energy contamination by minimizing scattering and space charge effects, while maintaining optimal beam control and trajectory alteration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a straight deceleration stage is used to decelerate the ion beam, then the ion beam can be transported efficiently, but energetic neutrals strike the substrate at higher energies causing energy contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion beam transport efficiencyVSAvoidenergy contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The deceleration stage is designed with a curved or bent geometry instead of a straight path. This curvature causes energetic neutrals that are not decelerated to miss the substrate, while the ion beam follows the curved path and is properly decelerated by the electric fields within the stage. The curved design physically separates the trajectories of neutrals and ions, eliminating energy contamination while maintaining transport efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Manufacturing precision

If the ion beam is decelerated to low energy before substrate impact, then precise energy delivery is achieved, but space charge forces cause the ions to repel each other limiting transport distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy delivery precisionVSAvoidbeam transport capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The deceleration process is divided into multiple stages rather than a single deceleration step. The ion beam is decelerated in increments through multiple electrode pairs along the curved path, allowing gradual reduction of energy while maintaining beam coherence. This segmented approach reduces space charge effects at any given point while achieving the target low energy at the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The curved deceleration path allows the ion beam to be transported and decelerated simultaneously along a bent trajectory. This geometry enables the beam to maintain lower energy over a longer effective path length, compensating for space charge repulsion by distributing the deceleration process over multiple electrode sections along the curve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a bend is introduced in the deceleration stage to screen neutrals, then energy contamination is reduced, but the design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy contaminationVSAvoiddeceleration stage design
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The curved deceleration stage performs multiple functions simultaneously: it decelerates the ion beam through electric fields, screens energetic neutrals from the substrate through its geometry, and maintains beam focus along the curved path. By combining these functions in a single integrated structure rather than separate components, the design achieves neutral screening without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces energy contamination and improves ion beam transport at lower energies by deflecting and decelerating ions, ensuring that energetic neutrals are not scattered towards the substrate, thereby maintaining precise energy delivery and reducing the risk of substrate damage.

Implementation Method 1

a deceleration assembly to decelerate the ion beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deceleration: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

a deflection assembly to deflect the ion beam, where the deflection assembly includes a second plurality of electrodes disposed within the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deflection: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

directing hydrogen gas into the deceleration stage during the decelerating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 4

minimizing scattering and space charge effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpace charge effect: Ion Repulsion/Attraction

Data Source

PatentUS10692697B2Apparatus and techniques for decelerated ion beam with no energy contamination
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 VARIAN SEMICON EQUIP ASSC INC
  • US10692697B2 patent drawing
  • US10692697B2 patent drawing
  • US10692697B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ion implantation system may include an ion source to generate an ion beam, a substrate stage disposed downstream of the ion source; and a deceleration stage including a component to deflect the ion beam, where the deceleration stage is disposed between the ion source and substrate stage. The ion implantation system may further include a hydrogen source to provide hydrogen gas to the deceleration stage, wherein energetic neutrals generated from the ion beam are not scattered to the substrate stage.