Curved Radial Flange Vane Segment for CMC Stress Management
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Implementing ceramic matrix composite (CMC) materials in gas turbine engine airfoils is challenging due to lower material stress limits compared to traditional superalloys, requiring a suitable support scheme to manage aerodynamic and thermal stresses without concentrating loads.
Innovation Solution
A vane arc segment design featuring hollow airfoil pieces with continuous fiber plies and curved radial flanges that act as single support features, facilitating a low-stress mounting scheme by segregating loads and distributing them uniformly across the platform, thereby enhancing stiffness and strength.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Temperature
If CMC materials are used in airfoils to achieve high temperature resistance, then temperature capability is improved, but stress resistance deteriorates due to lower material stress limits compared to superalloys
Solution Approach 1:
The airfoil is divided into multiple segments (first platform, airfoil section, second platform) that can be separately manufactured and then assembled. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while distributing stress concentrations across multiple joints and interfaces rather than requiring the entire structure to withstand peak stresses.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs ceramic matrix composite (CMC) materials that combine ceramic fibers with a matrix material to create a composite structure. This composite approach provides both the high-temperature resistance of ceramics and improved toughness and stress resistance compared to monolithic ceramics, enabling the airfoil to withstand aerodynamic and thermal stresses.
2Strength
If traditional support schemes are used for CMC airfoils, then structural support is provided, but stress concentration occurs due to inadequate load distribution
Solution Approach 1:
The support structure transitions from point-based or line-based support to area-based support through the use of platforms with circumferential support surfaces. The first and second platforms provide distributed support areas that contact the airfoil section over extended surfaces, transforming stress distribution from concentrated points to distributed areas and reducing peak stress concentrations.
Solution Approach 2:
The platforms feature curved circumferential support surfaces that conform to the aerodynamic shape of the airfoil. These curved surfaces distribute loads more evenly by avoiding sharp corners and abrupt geometric transitions that would create stress concentrations, allowing smooth stress flow across the support interfaces.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
A vane arc segment (60) includes an airfoil piece (62) that defines first and second platforms (64, 66) and an airfoil section (68) that extends between the first and second platforms (64, 66). The airfoil section (68) has a trailing edge (68b), a leading edge (68a), a pressure side (68c), and a suction side (68d). The platforms each define first and second circumferential mate faces (64c, 64d, 66c, 66d), forward and aft sides (64a, 64b, 66a, 66b), a gaspath side (64e, 66e), a non-gaspath side (64f, 66f), and a radial flange (70) that projects from the non-gaspath side (64f, 66f). Each radial flange (70) extends continuously and includes a first leg portion (70c) that extends adjacent the trailing edge (68b), a second leg portion (70d) that extends from the first leg portion (70c) and curves around the suction side (68d), and a third leg portion (70e) that extends from the second leg portion (70d) toward the forward side (64a, 66a).