Custodial Inventory Decisioning System for Vault Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bank vaults face challenges in determining the optimal amount of money to move into or out of the Custodial Inventory (CI) to comply with the Federal Reserve's minimum vault holding requirement, risking vault holding violations and missed cost savings opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A decisioning method and tool that retrieves cash balance and CI information, performs calculations, and allocates unverified funds using a statistically derived ratio to determine the amount to deposit or withdraw, while considering physical space constraints and FRB guidelines, to mitigate the risk of vault holding violations and maximize CI opportunities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If bank vaults move money into Custodial Inventory to maximize cost savings, then cost of funds savings increase, but the risk of vault holding violations increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecost of funds savingsVSAvoidvault holding requirement compliance

Core Design Contradiction:

Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations and allocations before actual CI transactions occur. It pre-determines the optimal amount to move into CI by considering minimum vault holding requirements, current CI balances, and projected cash flows, thereby preventing compliance violations before they happen while maximizing cost savings opportunities

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors vault cash balances, CI transactions, and holding requirements, using this feedback to dynamically adjust CI allocation decisions. This real-time feedback mechanism ensures compliance while optimizing cost savings based on current operational conditions

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If bank vaults maintain higher cash balances to ensure compliance with minimum vault holding requirements, then compliance reliability improves, but cost savings opportunities from CI are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvevault holding requirement complianceVSAvoidcost of funds savings

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the parameter of vault cash allocation by optimizing the split between CI and vault holdings based on multiple variables including minimum holding requirements, current balances, transaction patterns, and denominational ratios. This allows the system to achieve compliance with minimal required reserves while maximizing CI participation for cost savings

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If bank vaults manually calculate and decide CI transactions, then flexibility in decision-making is maintained, but the complexity and time required for compliance management increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvedecision-making flexibilityVSAvoidcompliance management complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating optimal CI transactions, allocating unverified funds using statistically derived ratios, and generating transaction instructions without requiring manual intervention. This automation reduces complexity while maintaining flexibility through configurable parameters and denominational ratio adjustments

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If bank vaults allocate unverified cash balances to meet minimum holding requirements, then compliance risk is reduced, but the amount available for CI participation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecompliance with minimum holding requirementVSAvoidcash available for CI

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by allocating only the necessary portion of unverified funds to meet minimum holding requirements, rather than conservatively allocating all unverified cash. Using statistically derived ratios from historical data, it determines the optimal partial allocation that ensures compliance while maximizing the remaining amount available for CI participation

Inventive Principle:

Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8175942B2Systems and methods for enhancing compliance with the federal reserve custodial inventory (CI) procedures

Publication Date: 2012.05.08 BANK OF AMERICA CORP

AI summary

Systems, methods and consumer-readable media for enhancing compliance with the Federal Reserve Custodial Inventory procedures are provided. The system may include an inventory management system for retrieving cash balance inventory information and an information management system for receiving Fed Cash information. This information may be retrieved using specific process steps and predetermined timing. The cash balance inventory information may include information about the amount of unverified cash in inventory. The Fed Cash information may include Custodial Inventory information, minimum vault holding requirement information, a Federal Reserve Cap and physical space cap for Custodial Inventory. The system may also display an amount that can be deposited in the Custodial Inventory. The amount may be based at least in part on the cash balance inventory information, the Custodial Inventory information, the minimum vault holding requirement information, the Federal Reserve Cap for Custodial Inventory and a ratio of 10 and/or 20 dollar bills in unverified cash balance to a total unverified cash balance.