Custom-Made Coating Indexing Across Dual Databases

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in efficiently matching custom-made coatings due to variations in chemical composition and environmental factors, leading to difficulties in accurately replicating target coatings in automotive repair and other applications.

Innovation Solution

A computer system is used to index custom-made coatings within a database by maintaining a primary database of standard coatings and a secondary database of user-specific coatings, allowing simultaneous searchability of both databases to enhance matching efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single database is used to store all coatings, then device complexity is reduced, but the system cannot efficiently handle custom-made coatings with varied chemical composition and properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle custom-made coatingsVSAvoiddatabase structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the coating database into two separate databases: a first database for storing standard coatings with known properties and a second database for storing custom-made coatings with varied properties. This segmentation allows each database to be optimized for its specific purpose while collectively providing comprehensive coverage of both standard and custom coatings, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary indexing mechanism that links the two databases together. This intermediary structure enables the system to search and retrieve coatings from either database efficiently, maintaining the benefits of a unified search capability while preserving the structural simplicity of separate databases. The intermediary layer mediates between the standardized first database and the flexible second database, allowing seamless integration without increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual entry of coating information is used, then ease of operation is improved, but time consumption and matching accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating matching speedVSAvoidvisual appearance matching accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual coating information entry and matching processes with an automated computer-based system. The system automatically stores coating characterization data, chemical composition, and visual properties in databases, and uses computational algorithms to match custom coatings with standard coatings based on multiple parameters. This substitution of mechanical manual processes with automated electronic systems simultaneously improves productivity through faster processing and enhances measurement precision through objective, data-driven matching criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously refines coating matches based on characterized properties and visual appearance data. The automated system analyzes the results of coating comparisons and adjusts matching algorithms to improve accuracy over time, providing feedback loops that enhance both the speed and precision of coating identification and selection processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If comprehensive coating data is stored, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and data management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating property information completenessVSAvoiddata storage and management structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments comprehensive coating data into two organized databases: the first database stores standardized coating information with consistent formatting and controlled vocabularies, while the second database stores custom coating data with flexible structures adapted to specific user needs. This segmentation preserves information completeness while reducing management complexity through standardized schemas for each database type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality principles by allowing different data structures and levels of detail in different parts of the system. The first database uses standardized, rigid structures for consistent coating data, while the second database allows flexible, adaptive structures for custom coatings. This local differentiation maintains information completeness where needed while simplifying data management through appropriate structural choices for each specific context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250298785A1Techniques for indexing custom-made coatings within a database
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC
  • US20250298785A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298785A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298785A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system for indexing custom-made coatings within a database may include processors and computer-readable media having stored thereon executable instructions. In some examples, the executable instructions may, when executed by the processors, cause the computer system to maintain a primary database including characterization data for a set of coatings (e.g., first-party coatings). The system may receive, from a user, characterization data or identifier data of a custom-made coating (e.g., a third-party coating) and may store the data in a secondary database. The computer system may then index the secondary database with the primary database such that the user may search both the primary database and the secondary database simultaneously. Accordingly, if the user performs a search, the computer system may return both first-party and third-party coatings. Such a system may provide benefits such as a more efficient workflow or a reduced search time.