Custom Ear Compression Device for Keloid Pressure Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current compression devices for managing keloids and hypertrophic scars on the earlobe are often ill-fitted, leading to uneven pressure distribution and reduced effectiveness in preventing recurrence, due to their generic design that does not conform to individual ear anatomy, resulting in inadequate compression and discomfort.

Innovation Solution

The use of 3-D digital scanning technology to create customized compression devices that precisely match the contours of each patient's earlobe or external ear anatomy, fabricated using biodegradable materials like Polylactic Acid and shape memory polymers, ensuring consistent pressure distribution and enhanced comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If generic compression devices are used, then manufacturing cost and simplicity are reduced, but pressure distribution uniformity and treatment effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpressure distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from generic, one-size-fits-all compression devices to customized devices with specific geometric parameters tailored to each patient's ear anatomy. The 3D scanning captures precise dimensional parameters, which are then used to generate custom device geometries that optimize pressure distribution for individual patients, directly resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and pressure uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements local quality by creating compression devices with locally optimized pressure application zones. Each device is customized to apply appropriate pressure at specific locations on the patient's ear based on their unique anatomy and keloid characteristics, rather than using uniform compression across all patients. This localized approach ensures optimal pressure distribution while maintaining manufacturing efficiency through digital fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If customized compression devices are used, then pressure distribution uniformity and treatment effectiveness are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure distribution uniformityVSAvoidcustomization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical customization process with digital fabrication technology. Instead of manually crafting custom devices, the system uses 3D scanning to capture ear geometry, digitally processes the data to optimize device parameters, and employs additive manufacturing (3D printing) to fabricate the custom device. This substitution of mechanical processes with digital and automated manufacturing reduces the practical complexity despite the high precision achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention manages customization complexity through systematic parameter management. The 3D scanning process captures essential geometric parameters, which are then processed through algorithms that determine optimal device specifications. This parameter-based approach transforms complex customization into a manageable digital workflow, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If extended wear duration is required for effective treatment, then treatment effectiveness improves, but patient comfort and compliance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear durationVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The customized compression devices apply pressure locally and uniformly across the keloid area rather than creating concentrated pressure points. This localized quality control, achieved through patient-specific 3D modeling, ensures that pressure is distributed evenly across the treatment area, preventing uncomfortable hot spots while maintaining effective compression throughout the required wear duration, thereby improving both comfort and compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11872109B1Customized ear compression device for keloid management
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 HUGHES LOWELL
  • US11872109B1 patent drawing
  • US11872109B1 patent drawing
  • US11872109B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present innovation is a customized compression device for prevention and treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scarring, primarily a frequent complication of ear piercing. The “one size fits all” design of traditional devices can compromise efficacy due to uneven fit and compression. This invention harnesses 3D digital scanning to capture the intricate contours of the ear for every patient, for personalized compression therapy. Using 3D printing, shells are fabricated with biocompatible materials such as Polylactic Acid, shape memory polymers, or silicone-based substances. In primary embodiments, device functionality is achieved with compression clips or spring-open, single-piece structures. The custom fit, potential for infusion of therapeutic agents (e.g., corticosteroids), and engineered porosity combine to improve keloid management from uniform pressure distribution and optimal healing. Additionally, the ‘shells’ can be pigmented to match patient skin tones and encourage compliance. The invention thus offers tailored keloid treatment, as well as prevention for high-risk individuals.