Custom Helmet Inner Surface Fitting From 3D Headform Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional helmet creation technologies fail to provide a custom fit for individual head shapes, relying on head circumference and requiring expensive scanning equipment and molds, leading to poor fit, comfort, and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A method for creating custom-fitted helmets using 3D headform data, generated from images of a deformable interface member on the customer's head, which is compared to a helmet safety standard to form an inner surface topography matching the customer's head dimensions and contours, allowing for remote data capture and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional helmet creation technology uses head circumference and padding adjustments, then the helmet can be manufactured using standard methods, but the fit and comfort for individual head shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing methodVSAvoidfit precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameters used for helmet sizing from simple head circumference to multiple parameters including head length, width, and contour data. This allows for more precise matching of helmet inner surface topography to individual head shapes while still using standardized manufacturing processes for the outer shell.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary scanning and data collection of the customer's head shape before helmet manufacturing. This preliminary action captures detailed head contour information that is then used to customize the inner surface topography, ensuring precise fit before the actual helmet production begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If expensive scanning equipment and separate molds are used for each helmet, then custom fit precision improves, but the cost and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustom fit precisionVSAvoidscanning and manufacturing equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a digital copy or model of the customer's head shape through scanning and data processing. This digital head model is then used to generate the customized inner surface topography data, eliminating the need for physical molds for each custom helmet while maintaining precise fit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a universal scanning system that can capture head shape data and then processes this data through computer algorithms to generate customization parameters. This multi-functional approach replaces the need for separate specialized equipment for each customization step, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional helmet design assumes similar human heads, then manufacturing is simplified, but the adaptability to individual head shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidhead shape adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by customizing only the inner surface topography of the helmet to match the individual's head shape, while the outer shell can remain standardized. This allows manufacturing simplicity to be maintained for the majority of the helmet structure while adapting to individual variations where it matters most for fit and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the helmet into distinct functional parts: a standardized outer shell for protection and a customized inner surface layer for fit. This segmentation allows the outer shell to be manufactured using simple standard processes while the inner layer is customized based on individual head scanning data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11889883B2System and method for forming a protective helmet for a customer's head
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 BELL SPORTS INC
  • US11889883B2 patent drawing
  • US11889883B2 patent drawing
  • US11889883B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A custom-fitted helmet and a method of making the same can comprise, at a first location, obtaining head data for a customer's head comprising a length, a width, and at least one head contour. With at least one processor, generating a computerized three-dimensional (3D) headform matching the customer's head length, width, and head contour from the head data. The 3D headform can be compared to a helmet safety standard. At a second location different from the first location, a custom-fitted helmet based on the 3D headform can be formed, wherein the custom-fitted helmet satisfies the safety standard and comprises an inner surface comprising a topography that conforms to the length, width, and at least one contour of the customer's head. The first location can be a home or a store. Obtaining the head data from photographic images of a deformable interface member disposed on the customer's head.