Custom Material Replacement for Accurate Partial Repairs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Insurance companies face challenges in efficiently replacing damaged construction materials, particularly when the original material is no longer available or has weathered, leading to costly and time-consuming complete replacements, and incorrect material identification can cause delays and additional expenses.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize image analysis and a reference database to identify matching materials, with a custom manufacturing facility generating replacement materials when the original is not available, ensuring accurate matching and reducing the need for full replacements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complete replacement of damaged materials is performed, then matching issues are avoided, but costs and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial matching accuracyVSAvoidreplacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the replacement decision into two paths: partial replacement (when material can be matched) and complete replacement (when material cannot be matched). By analyzing material availability and compatibility, the system determines whether to replace only damaged portions or entire structures, thereby optimizing both time and matching accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of material availability, compatibility, and sourcing options before making the replacement decision. By pre-evaluating whether matching materials are available and suitable, the system avoids time-consuming trial-and-error during the actual replacement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If complete replacement of damaged materials is performed, then matching issues are avoided, but costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial matching accuracyVSAvoidreplacement cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the replacement scope based on material compatibility assessment. When original or compatible materials are available, only damaged portions are replaced (partial replacement). When materials are unavailable or incompatible, complete replacement is initiated. This segmentation prevents unnecessary replacement of undamaged areas, reducing costs while maintaining matching quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the replacement scope parameter dynamically based on material availability and compatibility analysis. Rather than fixed complete replacement, the parameter adjusts to partial or complete replacement based on real-time assessment of material options, optimizing cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If material identification is performed manually, then flexibility is maintained, but accuracy and speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification flexibilityVSAvoidmaterial identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary automated analysis layer between the user and the material database. This intermediary performs image analysis, material property comparison, and compatibility assessment, bridging the gap between manual input and precise material identification, thereby maintaining flexibility while enhancing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system substitutes manual visual inspection and identification with automated image analysis and digital material database querying. This replacement of mechanical/manual processes with automated systems maintains user flexibility in initiating searches while dramatically improving identification precision and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual material identification is performed, then complex scenarios can be handled, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification capabilityVSAvoididentification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system acts as an intermediary that handles the time-consuming aspects of material identification while preserving the ability to manage complex scenarios. The intermediary rapidly processes images, queries databases, and evaluates compatibility, freeing users from manual identification tasks while maintaining comprehensive analysis capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis of material properties, compatibility, and availability before user review. This preliminary action handles routine identification tasks quickly, allowing users to focus on complex decision-making aspects, thereby increasing overall productivity without sacrificing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240300181A1System and method for custom material replacement
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US20240300181A1 patent drawing
  • US20240300181A1 patent drawing
  • US20240300181A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a material for a partial replacement includes receiving an image of a sample of an original material needing to be replaced, generating a representative data set for the original material based on the image received, accessing a reference database comprised of a plurality of different materials and including reference texture data or reference characteristic data for each of the plurality of different materials, comparing the representative data set to the reference data in the reference database, identifying at least one of the plurality of different materials correlated to the representative data set, determining the identified correlated material is not available, sending a request to generate a replacement material, and generating the replacement material.